Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Invisible tanks could be on battlefield within five years
#21
Rayquaza2233 Wrote:I saw this thread and looked nervously out the window.

Psh nothing interesting happens in Mississauga.
[COLOR="white"]
James Bond thought of this idea first[/COLOR]
Reply
#22
Hmm.. .... to quote solid snake.. "war.. has changed" but nooooooooooooot really.

the idea of a stealth tank is dumb as pomegranate. if they were smart they'd use this technology to make Octo Camo like in MGS4 or GITS .

asides from the noise a tank makes and the heat signature. its just a bad idea. then again so is war technology. the moment someone makes something its only a short amount of time before the "enemy" makes the same thing better. constantly improving their own arsenals against the other resulting in more dangerous weapons that will inevitably lead to MAD ( mutualy assured destruction ).

the u.s makes its gun cock bigger, britian does the same + 1, and so forth.

although this cycle is seemingly endless because if one party decides to stop it dosn't mean the other will, infact it is an incentive for them to pursue this even more to have a greater advantage.
Reply
#23
Here's a better picture of one:
 Spoiler

I don't think this will work well though...
Reply
#24
stupid idea is stupid.

And war will be less about stealth in 5 years than it is now. Currently all out warfare is more along the lines of "this is unstoppable, suck it peach"
Reply
#25
Actually war, as it is, is now as like described in MGS4, a series of proxy battles. Yes there is often a more higher level fight that either makes or breaks the effort, but really how does it all end up? A series of small firefights here and there that pop up day to day, week to week, etc.
Reply
#26
Jamie_Kurosawa Wrote:Actually war, as it is, is now as like described in MGS4, a series of proxy battles. Yes there is often a more higher level fight that either makes or breaks the effort, but really how does it all end up? A series of small firefights here and there that pop up day to day, week to week, etc.

Yeah dog, there is so much all out war occuring currently to draw this exprience from. It's theoretical and the only good theory says we all fucking die.
Reply
#27
Stealth bomber is better.

And britain didn't make this! Red alert 2 did!
Reply
#28
DustBunny Wrote:Stealth bomber is better.

And britain didn't make this! Red alert 2 did!

You sure that wasn't the original Command & Conquer?

Also, whenever someone says "great another way to kill people", I always think of those extremists from you-know-where.
Reply
#29
Looks like those terrorists better get to work developing EMP Grenades, seeing as one of those would effectively turn the tank into a paperweight from what I'm reading. (e-camo, electric engines..)
Reply
#30
Secun Wrote:Looks like those terrorists better get to work developing EMP Grenades, seeing as one of those would effectively turn the tank into a paperweight from what I'm reading. (e-camo, electric engines..)

an emp would kill like 90% of america along with the tank
Reply
#31
EMP would destroy the world.
L>starcraft 2 Ghost recon program with tactical nuke strikes and EMPs with Cloak.
Reply
#32
Worthyness Wrote:EMP would destroy the world.
L>starcraft 2 Ghost recon program with tactical nuke strikes and EMPs with Cloak.

tactical nukes can be emps, so that's just redunant.
Reply
#33
octopusprime Wrote:tactical nukes can be emps, so that's just redunant.

What if I nuke your emp while mirage tanking your front?

What you gonna do
Reply
#34
DustBunny Wrote:What if I nuke your emp while mirage tanking your front?

What you gonna do

SIEGE TANK RUSH
Reply
#35
octopusprime Wrote:tactical nukes can be emps, so that's just redunant.

Not in starcraft they don't :<

Looking forward to weapon tech. it's always interesting what people can think of next. Not a warhawk-esque person, but i enjoy looking at wartime technologies (e.g. the evolution of ranged warfare, close combat weaponry, etc.)
Reply
#36
Worthyness Wrote:Not in starcraft they don't :<

Looking forward to weapon tech. it's always interesting what people can think of next. Not a warhawk-esque person, but i enjoy looking at wartime technologies (e.g. the evolution of ranged warfare, close combat weaponry, etc.)

what eletronics in starcraft still function when you drop a nuke on them again?
Reply
#37
Meh, invisible tanks? I still have my money on Japan's army of Zoids and Gundams.

Hell, I think I'm going to marry a Japanese woman just so my son can join the Japan army and take my old ass for a ride in one of those mechs.
Reply
#38
Alex123123 Wrote:Meh, invisible tanks? I still have my money on Japan's army of Zoids and Gundams.

Hell, I think I'm going to marry a Japanese woman just so my son can join the Japan army and take my old ass for a ride in one of those mechs.

pahlease it's one gundam and the official story is that it is not real. However everyone knows it really is and your son would never be allowed to pilot due to not being 100% japanese and a direct decendant of someone or other.
Reply
#39
I'll adopt one then.

The investment is worth it.Chin
Reply
#40
Infra-red sensors or shrine a light to it, and its pwned. Its useless... they are just wasting the money of tax payers.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)