Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Invisible tanks could be on battlefield within five years
#1
British military scientists plan to develop an army of "invisible" tanks ready for use on the battlefield within five years.

[Image: tank__1799565c.jpg]

Armoured vehicles will use a new technology known as "e-camouflage" which deploys a form "electronic ink" to render a vehicle "invisible".
Highly sophisticated electronic sensors attached to the tank's hull will project images of the surrounding environment back onto the outside of the vehicle enabling it to merge into the landscape and evade attack.
The electronic camouflage will enable the vehicle to blend into the surrounding countryside in much the same way that a squid uses ink to help as a disguise.
Unlike conventional forms of camouflage, the images on the hull would change in concert with the changing environment always insuring that the vehicle remains disguised.
In Helmand, for example, all armoured vehicle have desert sand coloured camouflage, which is of little use in the "Green Zone", an area of cultivation where crops are grown and the Taliban often hide.

Up until recently such concepts were thought to be the stuff of science fiction but scientists at the defence company BAE Systems now believe battlefield "invisibility" will soon become science fact.
Scientists at the BAE hope the new technology will be available to use with the British Army fighting in Southern Afghanistan and in future conflicts.
The concept was developed as part of the Future Protected Vehicle programme, which scientists believe, will transform the way in which future conflicts will be fought.
The programme is based around seven different military vehicles, both manned and unmanned, which will be equipped with a wide variety of lethal and none lethal weapons.
The unmanned vehicles or battlefield robots will be able to conduct dangerous missions in hostile areas, clear minefields and extract wounded troops under fire.
The vehicles include:
* Pointer: an agile robot which can take over dirty, dull or dangerous jobs, such as forward observation and mine clearance.
* Bearer: a modular platform which can carry a range of mission payloads, such as protected mobility, air defence and ambulance;
* Wraith: a low signature scout vehicle;
* Safeguard: an ultra-utility infantry carrier or command & control centre;
* Charger: a highly lethal and survivable reconfigurable attack vehicle;
* Raider: a remotely or autonomously controlled unmanned recce and skirmishing platform – similar in design to the "Batmobile"
* Atlas: a convoy system which removes the driver from harm's way.
BAE's Future vehicle project is, in part, a reaction to the Ministry of Defence's (MoD) 'Capability Vision' for armoured vehicles, designed to spur development along different paths from the MoD's previous research.
Commanders are aiming for a prototype within four years and an experimental operational capacity by 2013.
The brief is for a lightweight vehicle, weighing 30 tonnes, powered by a hybrid electric drive, with the same effectiveness and survivability of a current main battle tank.
The UK's current tank, the Challenger 2, weighs 62.5 tonnes, and runs a 1,200hp V12 diesel engine.
Britain's current fleet of armoured vehicles are also close to approaching the end of their service life and armoured vehicles designed specifically for use in Helmand, such as the hugely successful Mastiff, may be inappropriate for use in other operational theatres.
Scientists at BAE are also looking at a number of revolution battlefield inventions which will increase troop protection as well as making the vehicles more lethal.
One concept being developed is to develop technologies, which will cut the use of fuel on the battlefield. In Afghanistan, the cost of fuel is 50 times that of the pump price.
All fuel currently used by NATO troops comes in via road convoys which are often attacked by insurgents which are responsible for 80 per cent of US casualties.
Scientists are close to developing a form of transparent armour - much tougher than bullet proof glass – which could be used in turrets of on the sides of armoured vehicles which would improve the situational awareness of troops inside.
Also being developed is a technology known as "biometric integration which uses advanced algorhythms to analyse crowds and to search for potential threats from suicide bombers by analyzing suspicious behavior in groups or individuals.
Electronic scanners would search for suspicious behavior, inappropriate clothing or individuals on wanted lists who can be identified through facial or iris recognition.
The information would then be displayed on screen within vehicle or handheld vehicles carried by dismounted troops.
Hisham Awad, the head of the Future Protected Vehicle project said: "The trick here is to use machines to do what they are best at (and humans are not) - ploughing very quickly through dull, repetitive data to strip out the overwhelming bulk which is of no use and would take a long time and enormous human resources to process.
"Then you can quickly bring human intelligence to bear where it excels - making life-or-death decisions based on 'real time' information on suspicious activity flagged up by the machines."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopi...years.html

More ways to kill people Tongue
Reply
#2
I would love it when the software that controls this crashes and gives a MASSIVE BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH on the tank!!!

Then the blue screen of death suddenly gets a new meaning... Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin

Also, it's not going to work... having that many heat sources on your tank is going to turn it into a IR-missile magnet...
Reply
#3
Devil Wrote:I would love it when the software that controls this crashes and gives a MASSIVE BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH on the tank!!!

Then the blue screen of death suddenly gets a new meaning... Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin

Also, it's not going to work... having that many heat sources on your tank is going to turn it into a IR-missile magnet...

A tank is already a missile magnet. The point is to make it harder to see.
Reply
#4
MasPan Wrote:A tank is already a missile magnet. The point is to make it harder to see.
You mean for other tanks with their high zoom optic IR camera's who can see this tank now at 50 miles away as a bright green dot?

The only thing that is missing is a floating arrow above it, saying "I'm here!!!". xD

The only way this could work if they have a massive cooling system combined with it...
Reply
#5
Wow Britain is gangster. I wonder what happens if they don't plan to share this technology with us.
Reply
#6
So much money wasted trying to find more effective ways to kill people...
Reply
#7
Clearly you know more about these kind of things than the people developing these Tanks, Devil. You should contact them immediately and relay your doubts.
Reply
#8
Devil Wrote:You mean for other tanks with their high zoom optic IR camera's who can see this tank now at 50 miles away as a bright green dot?

The only thing that is missing is a floating arrow above it, saying "I'm here!!!". xD

The only way this could work if they have a massive cooling system combined with it...

It's probably going to be for Light Armored Vehicles, or Artilary/Tanks on the mountain side.
Reply
#9
This is some Ghost in the Shell type pomegranate here I swear to God.
Reply
#10
Tanks: now only 3 billion dollars! One shotting that masterpiece will cost you more money than the entire Healthcare system!

This tech has been in R&D for a while. I remember a few years ago some people were using the same tech to make "invisibility cloaks".

Future wars: They will depend on gamers to see who has the highest APM and highest reflexes. remember to play your RTS games gaiz!
Reply
#11
Now they just need silent artillery and jet boosters that are also silent and it will truly be unstoppable.

By the way, TS is my favorite topic poster right now.
Reply
#12
Am I the only one who thought of the Flying tanks/sharks meme when I first saw this?
Reply
#13
The problem with the e-sensors and e-camo also are one I forsee...

What are they going to do about the sound and heat signatures of the tank? Even better how well will the e-camo stand up to harsh conditions, electronic interference, and even the firing of the tank in which could damage the e-camo itself?
Reply
#14
Um...it honestly won't be that hard to spot a tank while it's firing guns O_o. And if it's trying to be a ninja tank...you must be deaf to not hear it.

Also, while it's probably initially hard to spot, once you spot the outline....is it really that hard?

ChaosH Wrote:So much money wasted trying to find more effective ways to kill people...

Maybe Britain is donating it to the U.N. Security Council Biggrin.

Ha.
Reply
#15
Hm, sounds like this is "stealth" for the tanks. Rolleyes

Though I wonder if thermal-imaging anti-tank weapons (such as the FGM-148 Javelin) will negate this technology. Rolleyes
Reply
#16
All I need is a camouflage suit now to evade my enemies!
Reply
#17
What about shadows?
Reply
#18
I saw this thread and looked nervously out the window.
Reply
#19
Devil Wrote:The only way this could work if they have a massive cooling system combined with it...

Unless you mean that the tank would have liquid nitrogen inside or something of the sort it's impossible to have a cooling system without having anything hotter on the outside of it (just look at the back of fridges, power sources of computers, the outside part of air conditioning.

To evacuate heat from one place you have to place it somewhere else.
Reply
#20
everytime a new weapon gets developed. 100 unicorns die.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)