2009-08-05, 03:58 PM
TheTyphoon Wrote:you do realize that no other version has hammers? or stompers? or MoN's?
jMS has facestompers. Don't ask where they come from, couldn't tell ya.
|
KoC can't get MoN >.<
|
|
2009-08-05, 03:58 PM
TheTyphoon Wrote:you do realize that no other version has hammers? or stompers? or MoN's? jMS has facestompers. Don't ask where they come from, couldn't tell ya.
2009-08-05, 09:52 PM
MasPan Wrote:Or they blocked it this way to prevent 5 egg pendants. They may have intended to release the hammer from the beginning, and blocked 3 egg specifically to prevent having 82 stat pendants. I dunno, HTP were out ages ago and were deemed "overpowered" so they have the restriction. IIRC it wasnt NexAm who put in the restriction. As mentioned elsewhere, this has a strange resemblance to the white-slating issue.
2009-08-05, 10:00 PM
ImVindictive Wrote:Bigfoot glitch? Diamond glitch? Opq glitch? you can't compare those glitches to this. everyone knew that those were glitches that shouldn't have been abused. it was obvious. nobody knows if this is a glitch or if it was meant.
2009-08-05, 10:06 PM
I could be wrong, but the hammer was meant to allow fully scrolled items the ability to have two more slots. HTP isnt fully scrolled
![]() Whats funny to me is that people arguing one side in this and other threads have argued other sides in other cases.
2009-08-05, 10:10 PM
Actually, that's an excellent solution. Make it so hammers can only be used on fully scrolled items, and the item MUST have 0 slots to use a hammer. It doesn't affect anything but HTPs.
2009-08-05, 10:14 PM
loddlaen Wrote:I could be wrong, but the hammer was meant to allow fully scrolled items the ability to have two more slots. HTP isnt fully scrolled where did nexon say it had to have 0 slots to use hammer on. and if i recall, they actually gave a SS of them hammering a scarab with 7 slots i think? and it ending up with 8. fixed
2009-08-05, 10:16 PM
I didnt say they said that specifically. The way they marketed it however was to suggest that you can add slots to your fully scrolled items. "Make your godlies, godlier" so to speak
2009-08-05, 10:17 PM
well heres the pic they marketed the hammer with. taken right from their site
Spoiler
2009-08-05, 10:22 PM
Wanna show the top of that image?
![]() Taken straight from their site, first line reads "Item slots all full up? Think you've taken your item as far as it can go? Think again!"
2009-08-05, 10:25 PM
I think that making it so that a hammer can only be used on the last slot is a good idea. It doesn't really hinder anybody except for scrolling 52 stat pendants, which it would be a fix for anyways.
2009-08-05, 10:34 PM
Why the last slot? Unless you mean at 0 slots, but how i understand it is that by 'last slot' you mean 1 slot remaining, which is strange in my eyes.
2009-08-05, 10:42 PM
Holypie Wrote:Why the last slot? Unless you mean at 0 slots, but how i understand it is that by 'last slot' you mean 1 slot remaining, which is strange in my eyes. Oh right, not slots.
2009-08-05, 11:11 PM
loddlaen Wrote:Wanna show the top of that image? that wouldnt matter, its just a phrase they used to advertise the hammer.. it wouldnt matter anyways seeing as the image they used was of a clean scarab.
2009-08-05, 11:33 PM
loddlaen Wrote:So why is the image more relevant than the opening line that people read? A picture is worth a thousand words.
2009-08-05, 11:41 PM
I'd bet 1000 that the people defending the HTP + VH issue is benefiting from it (Str for an Engaw maybe?)
![]() Any ways, I'll take a similar possition and believe this as a glitch until Nexon say otherwise.
2009-08-05, 11:44 PM
byakugan Wrote:I'd bet 1000 that the people defending the HTP + VH issue is benefiting from it (Str for an Engaw maybe?) if you knew me, you'd certainly know im not benefitting from it. i can't even play my bm for a month. but you can also say that the people who are saying its a glitch are people who dont have access to more eggs to scroll their htp
2009-08-05, 11:55 PM
TheTyphoon Wrote:A picture is worth a thousand words. We know Nexon are lazy. I can't see them scrolling an item specifically to show extra slots for a hammer.
2009-08-06, 07:37 AM
i think what many here have said is going to wind up being true. one way or another nexon is going to come out and say something about these pendants, and given their track record, chances are it is not going to be in the superscrollers favor. i think it might be wise to wait and see rather than rush ahead and find out its not going to stay that way. elemental weps just got nailed, and they've been out for how long with them saying they were working as intended?
(seriously though, enough with the butthurt already. either way its not like you are going to solve anything by arguing about it for 4 pages)
2009-08-06, 08:31 AM
revansithasasin Wrote:i think what many here have said is going to wind up being true. one way or another nexon is going to come out and say something about these pendants, and given their track record, chances are it is not going to be in the superscrollers favor. i think it might be wise to wait and see rather than rush ahead and find out its not going to stay that way. elemental weps just got nailed, and they've been out for how long with them saying they were working as intended? Kinda lulz that this started because KoC can't get MoNs and now its about HT pendants and hammers
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|