Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
KoC can't get MoN >.<
#41
RDal Wrote:That quote means very little. Nexon obviously didn't see the loophole in HT pendant scrolling, otherwise I'm pretty sure the way it is coded would have changed. And don't you dare take the 'it's not a glitch until Nexon says it's a glitch' attitude, you hypocrite.

I'm sure if your little buddy Harrison was saying this you wouldn't even show your face. Look who is the hypocrite now. Frown
Reply
#42
Opeth Wrote:I'm sure if your little buddy Harrison was saying this you wouldn't even show your face. Look who is the hypocrite now. Frown

Actually if you would search up several other glitch related threads either on here or Sleepywood you would probably find me and Harrison going head to head over it. I'm no hypocrite, and that's not hypocrisy anyway. That's called double standards.
Reply
#43
I still don't see proof about how the HT pendant is a "glitch." Sure the coding says if it doesn't have 3 slots it shouldn't work, but that's what the Vicious Hammer is for. :3
Reply
#44
There it goes, common sense just jumped out the window.
Reply
#45
How do you all figure? If the HT pendant can be hammered it's not breaking any rules. You all need to get over yourselves.
Reply
#46
I'm only gonna say......I'ma wait and see what Nexon does. Rolleyes

But in regards, if KoCs are prohibited from CWKPQ, I'm guessing that it might have to do with Nexon limiting their already-overpowered status of some sort.
Reply
#47
I could care less about this glitch, especially since both sides benefit from it. Nexon's making a ton of money from it, and only the idiot moral-bound f'aggots will remain stuck as weaklings. Most of you are just butthurt over the fact that you're incapable of HTing, or maybe you made the retarded move of completely changing your statbuilds after Naricain Pendants came out; it doesn't matter, because if you had a +1 HTP, 16k NX, and two Nine Spirit eggs sitting in front of you, you'd all "abuse" this in a snap.
Reply
#48
The HTP glitch is probably going to be comparable to how HP washing is a glitch. Dohohohoh.
Reply
#49
Jack Barricade is a damn racist. >:O
Reply
#50
Greg Wrote:Most of you are just butthurt over the fact that you're incapable of HTing.

This is pretty much exactly what it is. Nexon would be smart to keep HTP's able to be scrolled +52. Right after they ended the AP reset sale, people are going to still buy resets and get their pend's to 52. They benefit from this just as much as the players.
Reply
#51
Damn, my KoC can't get a Man.. i mean, a MoN.
Reply
#52
Kabanaw Wrote:Ok guys, because Nexon hasn't said that BF isn't supposed to be poisoned, that means that it's ok to!

Opeth, if they wanted us to scroll 52 stat pendants, they would let us use 3 eggs without a hammer. This is obviously a glitch, and even without nexon saying so you should assume anything fishy is a glitch.

Inb4 Nexon consparicy theorists say it's to get more $$$

This. If they were meant to be egg'ed 3 times they wouldnt block it after the first egg.
Come on, it is Nexon America we're talking about. It's not the first time something like this has happened. Hell, even the elemental weapons, which they declared were meant to work like they did, were fixed later.

First you ppl say MoN's were a good move to encourage non statless builds, not you say the ones who changed their builds are stupid <.<.

Just think about how many other MS versions out there have to work their asses to get something like +10 to all stats (Zak helm's in JMS for example) and you'll see why +52 stats in just way too much.
Reply
#53
byakugan Wrote:This. If they were meant to be egg'ed 3 times they wouldnt block it after the first egg.
Come on, it is Nexon America we're talking about. It's not the first time something like this has happened. Hell, even the elemental weapons, which they declared were meant to work like they did, were fixed later.

First you ppl say MoN's were a good move to encourage non statless builds, not you say the ones who changed their builds are stupid <.<.

Just think about how many other MS versions out there have to work their asses to get something like +10 to all stats (Zak helm's in JMS for example) and you'll see why +52 stats in just way too much.

Or they blocked it this way to prevent 5 egg pendants. They may have intended to release the hammer from the beginning, and blocked 3 egg specifically to prevent having 82 stat pendants.
Reply
#54
byakugan Wrote:This. If they were meant to be egg'ed 3 times they wouldnt block it after the first egg.
Come on, it is Nexon America we're talking about. It's not the first time something like this has happened. Hell, even the elemental weapons, which they declared were meant to work like they did, were fixed later.

First you ppl say MoN's were a good move to encourage non statless builds, not you say the ones who changed their builds are stupid <.<.

Just think about how many other MS versions out there have to work their asses to get something like +10 to all stats (Zak helm's in JMS for example) and you'll see why +52 stats in just way too much.

you do realize that no other version has hammers? or stompers? or MoN's?
Reply
#55
First few weeks of MoN being tradeable:
Put a MoN in storage.
Wait for Cygnus.
Receive MoN from storage as your Cygnus.
Profit.
Reply
#56
Good idea, punch. Lemme just go get my time machine and I'll get right on it.
Reply
#57
MasPan Wrote:Or they blocked it this way to prevent 5 egg pendants. They may have intended to release the hammer from the beginning, and blocked 3 egg specifically to prevent having 82 stat pendants.

I think you're giving them to much credit to think that far ahead. I'm not against it for either way, it's a risk imo considering it can poof or be banned for it, or that's my concern anyway.
Reply
#58
ImVindictive Wrote:I think you're giving them to much credit to think that far ahead. I'm not against it for either way, it's a risk imo considering it can poof or be banned for it, or that's my concern anyway.

I actually agree with Mas
Reply
#59
ImVindictive Wrote:I think you're giving them to much credit to think that far ahead. I'm not against it for either way, it's a risk imo considering it can poof or be banned for it, or that's my concern anyway.

Banning accounts for a mistake/glitch they allowed to happen? Oh that's rich.
Reply
#60
IllegallySane Wrote:Banning accounts for a mistake/glitch they allowed to happen? Oh that's rich.

Bigfoot glitch? Diamond glitch? Opq glitch? Rolleyes And yes, they banned players who did it before the announcement.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)