2011-07-07, 12:16 AM
Kalovale Wrote:I think that's the whole point he's making (as I was). Levels of femininity/masculinity do not change the sexual orientation of the person.
This. Duh.
And what Loose said. It's all a matter of preference. Would you say that, statistically speaking, couples of ANY sexual orientation gravitate towards "masculine/feminine" or "dominant/passive" dualisms? Perhaps, but there are plenty of instances where that's not the case, enough so to make this thread slightly ridiculous as to not provide this as an option. I'd fit this perfectly, as I don't mind clear-cut dualism every now and then, but would ultimately prefer a partner where gender roles are fluid/undefined. Physicality and personality fits the given situation, with (obviously) changes fluctuating in the realm of personality and the physicality to inherently, adequately, contribute to either role.

