With the release of the cannon shooter, it proives my theory!

I'm not arguing anything.

Really?

"They're either Adventurers/Explorers or they're not." - Bringing up an entirely different issue.

"They either conform to the creation, nature and rules of that class system or they don't, and whether or not they have their own class creation screen is irrelevant unless it actually changes how they level up, in which case they're not technically adventurers they just occupy the same root on the class tree." - Arguing the terms and definitions.

Metaseraphim was arguing it with kimaera, poorly,

Um... no.
MetaSeraphim never posed any sort of argument against Kimaera; in fact, that would be ridiculous since it's quite clear that he totally agrees with what the latter said.
All MetaSeraphim did was point out that Kimaera's post was completely non sequitur.

and now you're trying to argue a side you've decided I've taken when all I did is tell Meta to more clearly state what his argument is supposed to be if he's going to try to pick one.

I decided nothing. You said what you said, after all.

If you believed MetaSeraphim was making a poor case, you could have just said so.
That would have been far more efficient then stomping in here, taking phrases completely out of context, and creating a disagreement where there wasn't one... ya know, like you did.

Meanwhile, Meta's statement was quite clear:
Just because regular Adventurers are Adventurers and Dual Blades are Adventures doesn't mean that Dual Blades are regular Adventurers.
There were no semantics there; it's pure logic.