Southperry.net › Social › Shenanigans v
23 is the new 65?

Linear Mode
23 is the new 65?
Kabanaw
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 3,054
Threads: 142
Joined: 2008-07
Gender: Male
Country Flag: Massachusetts
IGN: flarfek
Server: Scania
Level: 150
Job: ILAM
#8
2011-03-12, 05:16 PM
Justin Wrote:At ages 10-12? I dunno man, I thought 14-17 was the norm back then for marriage + kids.

Even if it was, consider that the norm today is about early 30s. Is it outrageous for people in their 20s to have kids?

Not that this isn't a fairly disturbing.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
23 is the new 65? - by Netto - 2011-03-12, 04:41 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Mute - 2011-03-12, 04:52 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Imitazion - 2011-03-12, 04:56 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Justin - 2011-03-12, 05:08 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Rob - 2011-03-12, 05:11 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Justin - 2011-03-12, 05:13 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Sarah - 2011-03-12, 05:14 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Kabanaw - 2011-03-12, 05:16 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Rob - 2011-03-12, 05:16 PM
23 is the new 65? - by XTOTHEL - 2011-03-12, 05:19 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Sarah - 2011-03-12, 05:23 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Mute - 2011-03-12, 05:32 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Netto - 2011-03-12, 05:50 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Kabanaw - 2011-03-12, 06:12 PM
23 is the new 65? - by XTOTHEL - 2011-03-12, 06:22 PM
23 is the new 65? - by Pixie - 2011-03-13, 08:16 AM
23 is the new 65? - by MetaSeraphim - 2011-03-14, 09:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)