I'd cite it if I had access to the skill.wz. Could you, ah, possibly bring it to Fiel's attention for me? I posted a thread in the suggestions forum.
Anyway, copy and paste Inferno 30 and Fire Charge 30 here and I'll show you. I don't think Fire Arrow has anything in the data, since its attribute is assumed to be full.
And like I said, Inferno could still be calculated as partial element and not partial boost. All it means is that since Inferno has no element other than fire to "split" the immunity with, it gets reduced to 1 even though it's technically not full element.
(portion of element affected by immunity)/(total element attribute) = portion of damage negated by immunity.
Since Comp's element totals to 1, but only half of it is affected by Elderwraiths' ice immunity, only half the damage is negated. However, since Inferno's element only totals to 0.5 and all of that is affected by Firebrands' immunity, all the damage is negated.
I personally still think this way makes more sense, since if they did it the other way they'd have to manually divide by 2 (why is the attribute value double the actual bonus/penalty in the first place, if not to signify the percent attribute?).
Anyway, copy and paste Inferno 30 and Fire Charge 30 here and I'll show you. I don't think Fire Arrow has anything in the data, since its attribute is assumed to be full.
And like I said, Inferno could still be calculated as partial element and not partial boost. All it means is that since Inferno has no element other than fire to "split" the immunity with, it gets reduced to 1 even though it's technically not full element.
(portion of element affected by immunity)/(total element attribute) = portion of damage negated by immunity.
Since Comp's element totals to 1, but only half of it is affected by Elderwraiths' ice immunity, only half the damage is negated. However, since Inferno's element only totals to 0.5 and all of that is affected by Firebrands' immunity, all the damage is negated.
I personally still think this way makes more sense, since if they did it the other way they'd have to manually divide by 2 (why is the attribute value double the actual bonus/penalty in the first place, if not to signify the percent attribute?).