2008-09-17, 12:41 AM
NO archer skills are useless =P Cuase we're just that awesome xD
But I have hated this dilema for a long while. It's always (for rangers at least) hawk, mortal blow, inferno, thrust. one of the most difficult decisions to make in the archer's career. I'll keep the 99% stun rate of hawk (level 29) and max mortal blow, leaving 0 thrust and 22 inferno. I personally don't care too much for passive speed, sure it's good to have, but i haven't the slightest clue about the workings of higher levels (only 105 D=) From my experience, I need the 99% stun rate of hawk. I think inferno looks cool.
Thrust just seems annoying to me... But i could have regrets later, but for now, no regrets of my build to come =)
But I have hated this dilema for a long while. It's always (for rangers at least) hawk, mortal blow, inferno, thrust. one of the most difficult decisions to make in the archer's career. I'll keep the 99% stun rate of hawk (level 29) and max mortal blow, leaving 0 thrust and 22 inferno. I personally don't care too much for passive speed, sure it's good to have, but i haven't the slightest clue about the workings of higher levels (only 105 D=) From my experience, I need the 99% stun rate of hawk. I think inferno looks cool.
Thrust just seems annoying to me... But i could have regrets later, but for now, no regrets of my build to come =)

