The "Bishop Ult vs. AM Ult" thread

What? This thread is about "Bishop Ult vs. AM Ult". In other words, this is a thread to compare Genesis to Blizzard/Meteo. Get the pineapple outta here if you want to talk about Priest pumpernickel.

Normally I'd say something, but what the filter did to your post is too funny.

The problem with this logic is that Bishops aren't "support". They're an attacking class, because they have to be to get good enough experience rates.

That's not to say Bishops should be the strongest, I agree in the aspect that it sucks that Bishops have it easy on Holy-weak mobs while Mages lack equivalent mobs.

Like I've already said, I think all fullscreen attacks should be equal, even Blizzard that has the apparent advantage of freezing, even Genesis which belongs to a supposed support-only class. You may see Bishops as "durhur support only", but I can tell you that no selfrespecting endgame level Bishop sees themself in that way-- they see themself as a holy elemental magician. They are Magicians who attack using Holy elemental magic-- they're not a "support class", they just have some skills that function as support in certain instances (specifically boss fights).

You're blurring the class line. If you think that, then we can solve the problem by having Nexon rename them: Mage H/H. (Heal/Holy.)