2010-03-22, 01:51 PM
Eosian Wrote:Excepting the fundamental underlying flaws in our healthcare system itself that were unaddressed, such as the insanely frivolous malpractice laws (and related insurance) the over-charing for services and medication to cover the cost of lobbying and marketing and so forth.You'll probably like this.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/philip_howard.html
Last time I was in Pittsburgh visiting grandparents, my family from Maui were there with us. We got into an interesting conversation about Hawaiian hospitals vs. most other state's hospitals. Hawaii has laws requiring hospitals to actually show a population need for a particular service or technology. So within a certain area, not every hospital would have the same expensive machinery and services. Which means hospitals aren't acting like competitive businesses, instead they're distributing services across a population in a cost effective manner. This discussion was prompted because we drove by a sign advertising a Pittsburgh hospital's new "Full Body scanner". Which is a ridiculous waste of time and money. Even House hates full body scans.
@ Mark
Ah, the everything mess.
Derail in progress. Fun times arguing politics ahead
I know this is fence-sitty of me, but I'm 50/50 with this bill. Given that my mom has had Multiple Sclerosis for at least 15 years now, I know how medical costs can pineapple up a family, even with a job and insurance. (My dad was out of work for almost 2 years until January. Little late with the timing on this, Congress. lololol) I look at the healthcare system in America and I see an aging beast. It needs a fix sooner than later. I'm pleased to see Obama and many other legislators have fought for something to be done. That being said, I think this was a sort of wobbly step sideways. It feels more like putting shiny new titanium knee replacements into an old man. He might walk a lot better, but he's still an old man heading for death.
The ultimate decider for health care reform will be execution. I feel this way about a lot of bills. Not every provision may be agreeable, but if it can be executed properly, a mediocre plan becomes better than a perfect plan executed poorly. So, what I really want from this bill is a timely institution of the provisions, as well as the supposed outcome of this saving the government money in the long run.

