2010-01-21, 02:15 AM
Rick Wrote:Well there are two things to say.
1) Did the men abandon them well in to pregnancy (well past the point of an abortion). If yes, then no, this does not fit the male abortion. Acting within that time frame is a requirement.
2) If they did abandon them during that time frame, the women still chose to keep the baby.
As for the having sex being a risk part, yes it is. But it is not fair to say "if you are a woman, you're allowed a back door. If you're a man, hope like hell the woman listens to you". And as for men wanting to have sex without a condom, you are assuming that pregnancy is therefore the man's fault, whereas women also have contraception open to them.
It doesn't matter whther they abandoned them or not. If they stay with the woman, they are providing for the child. If they don't stay with the woman they also must provide for the child. Why the fuuck should the woman bear the sole responsibility of raising the kid, while working, while the guy who knocked her up gets to not pay anything and be with different women? Of course the man will want this male abortion crap. It'll save him a fortune over the next 18 years. He can also go be with a woman he finds more desirable, all the while this woman is stuck with his kid.
Contraceptives are something both parties are responsible for. The woman typically must take the pill properly, and the man needs to carry condoms. If you're a guy and you have sex without a condom, that's really dumb.