2010-01-18, 08:50 PM
In an attempt to further my point... why not see this instead of a way for guys to opt out, as... oh say... a deterrent for people to have sex until they are actually dedicated to one another.
For those of you saying that guys deserve to pay for getting a woman pregnant and thus should not be allowed any way to opt out your missing a point or so:
1) With the knowledge that the men have the option to sever the ties to the woman and kid, the female in question would likely not even have sex in the first place with the "men who deserve to pay for ~~~".
2) To those saying sex has been perverted and has become a recreational thing... this change might actually encourage sex away from this. It might encourage sex away from just recreational, to between people who are actually married or in very serious relationships.
3) To those will respond by saying that people will still do it recreationally but just use protection instead: This still doesn't refute my point. At the very least couples will be MUCH more careful (at least women) when choosing who to have sex with due to the guy's option to leave her completely if she gets pregnant. This might actually result in a drastically reduced amount of cases with single mothers.
Not sure if I missed anything here, will respond to other issues later.
For those of you saying that guys deserve to pay for getting a woman pregnant and thus should not be allowed any way to opt out your missing a point or so:
1) With the knowledge that the men have the option to sever the ties to the woman and kid, the female in question would likely not even have sex in the first place with the "men who deserve to pay for ~~~".
2) To those saying sex has been perverted and has become a recreational thing... this change might actually encourage sex away from this. It might encourage sex away from just recreational, to between people who are actually married or in very serious relationships.
3) To those will respond by saying that people will still do it recreationally but just use protection instead: This still doesn't refute my point. At the very least couples will be MUCH more careful (at least women) when choosing who to have sex with due to the guy's option to leave her completely if she gets pregnant. This might actually result in a drastically reduced amount of cases with single mothers.
Not sure if I missed anything here, will respond to other issues later.