2010-01-17, 03:05 PM
Devil's Sunrise Wrote:Devil's Lawyer incoming.
By accepting this, men might abuse and leave a higher stress level on the average woman. Even with child support, single women with kids have a hard time getting in enough money. If the child-support is removed, it would make it impossible to earn enough for some families. Therefore, you are giving some women a quite hard question: Shall I take an abortion, or should I give birth to this child and give it a horrible youth?
Yes, they may abuse it. But you can't assume they will. And the woman has a third option: Should I give birth and adopt it out to a loving family?
Quote:Another problem with this, is a specific part of the quote:
Let me assume your idea is applied. Could a quote like this be a reality?
No, it couldn't. They both hold their own direction, because if the father leaves that doesn't mean the woman HAS to have it. She still has a choice.
Quote:But more importantly, is there any need of this law? Out of all childbirths in, say, America, how many of the fathers would have used this if they had the chance?
Well it just means the law is there for those that do need to use it. You're not going to cancel treatment for a rare disease just because not many will need it.
Quote:To fix the "I want to have the baby, but my gf doesn't", then, whenever that's possible (if that's possible, that is), give the men the possibility to carry out the pregnancy if they want to.
How on Earth does that work? The only way is to force the woman to keep it, and then you're telling her what to do with her body. I don't support that, it's anti-abortionist thinking.

