2009-08-15, 05:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 2009-08-15, 06:58 AM by singularity.)
Russt Wrote:Yeah, that has to do with accumulating little rounding/subtracting errors. Lots of calculations + floating point numbers = bleh. In actuality the chances of 16/17/18 hitting that are small enough that it doesn't matter. 1/2/3 hitting shouldn't be inaccurate though, there's relatively little dividing by large numbers..Kinda inaccurate... but pretty close.
At this point I could care less anyway. I made that quite a long ago and it's not used enough for me to bother trying to fix/change.
Used TT Min/Max of 6297 and 12999 for these.
![[Image: 4744495_370x359.png]](http://www.picamatic.com/show/2009/08/15/02/38/4744495_370x359.png)
![[Image: 25rm24z.png]](http://i26.tinypic.com/25rm24z.png)
Not really sure why the first set is more accurate when the results are more ridiculous in first set below (in spoiler).
And yes, it's reallllllllllly bad when the calculated hits are 15+.
Spoiler
![[Image: nfo9at.jpg]](http://i27.tinypic.com/nfo9at.jpg)