2009-04-13, 11:06 AM
Azalea Wrote:This thread gets created over and over again because somehow it's seen as an intelligent conversation. All it does is pit science-wannabees against biblically ignorant Judeo-Christian socialites against each other. It truly attracts the most idiotic and asinine comments that convince no one to change their belief system.
This is true. However, you are revealed to be an utter, absolute fool by the remainder of your statement, which isn't precisely ironic, but it is funny. Nobody with actual knowledge is claiming we understand absolutely everything about the entirety of human origin and it is all a clear, perfect map shown by the fossil record. What people who argue for evolution are stating is that it is, quite simply, the best theory we have. It does not conflict with what has been found; it accurately predicted a number of things we have found, and it's been proven to be reliable in many dozens of circumstances.
Furthermore, the idea that intelligent design is science is stupid at best and malicious at worst. Intelligent design is a philosophy; there is no way to scientifically prove that we were designed by someone.
On a secondary note, people who argue about statistical impossibilities, irreducible complexity, separate 'micro' and 'macro' evolution and other related intelligent-design arguments quite simply do not understand anything they are talking about. It would be a more worthy use of my time to learn to speak Sanskrit than to convince anyone that deluded of anything that is remotely accurate.
