Crooked Hillary!

In an attempt to garner sympathy, he is essentially saying that 4-5 Trump supporters beat up OVER 20 PROTESTORS handily. BAREHANDED. So, this is one of three things, a false flag, a legitimate group of disgruntled Trump supporters, or entirely fabricated. In the first situation, some protestors injured themselves to post on twitter how violent Trump supporters are, not realizing how fucking weak and pathetic it makes them look, in the second, some legitimate Trump supporters actually beat the pomegranate out of some protestors and the protestors post it on twitter, AGAIN making themselves look weak and pathetic, and in the third and most likely case, they simply make themselves look weak and pathetic for a perceived gain that does not actually exist.

You have more apophenia than actual logic in your ranting. When you're in the middle of a group of people how long does it take you to realize you're under attack from a sneak attack?

Could you walk into a distracted crowd and hit 4 people before the rest of them figured out what was going on?
Is it "weak" to be surprised by an unprovoked sneak attack? Most people aren't trained to recognize they're under attack and need to go on the defensive, or even to know what the defensive is. Does that somehow invalidate their victimization?

That aside, according to the post, which itself is tiny and somewhat vague, 3-4 of them took serious injury, out of 20. You're making weird logistical leaps that all 20 of them were hurt, although that is quite possible if the rest of those 20 were trying to pull the 4-5 guys off the ones they they were targeting, which would be consistent with the few of them more severely hurt.

I am concerned with your view of the world when your entire focus here is on how "weak" people look when they're victimized and how readily you're looking for excuses as to why something like this didn't or couldn't happen and blaming the victims on the off chance it did than actually trying to ascertain if it did.

Could it be a hoax? Yes. But why would they be doing it to advocate love and peace if it were? Unprovoked attacks are the sort of thing one manufactures as a call to war, not as an example of why peace and tolerance are needed on both sides. I'm sure your irrational need for everything to be a conspiracy sees the love and peace as a red herring so they can look innocent and sweet while other liberals wave them as an example of reason to crusade.