Crooked Hillary!

You see that word "shared" that you quoted me having said? That indicates my awareness of who Anthony was sharing that particular phone with. It also indicates my understanding that this was not either of their default accounts, but a shared account that just happened to have been used for what appears to have been 3 emails total and are highly unlikely to have been anything more urgent than "yes ma'am, i will get your coffee and lick your boots, thank you ma'am". If you agree the odds of Hillary sending useful info to that phone are low, why on earth would her peon of an assistant even have anything to send, let alone be sending it to her on that line?

What is your definition of "useful"? Classified data? close to zero. Things that can be used to further substantiate evidence found from other sources such as the main batch of emails, the veritas videos, or any number of other leaks? Quite good. The day those videos came out, a whole new set of information suddenly became relevant in the server emails, things that were previously considered benign, like the times of certain meetings matching up between what was said in the videos and what was said internally, proving that those meetings did in fact happen, as well as context on what "birddogging" was which was brought up in the emails but nobody originally knew what it meant. Alone, the information on that phone will be worthless, but combined with other information, the dates, times, people involved and a number of other factors are suddenly important; if both sides of the deal are confirming that it's true internally it's probably what really happened.

Out of curiosity, have you read this one?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...story.html

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, the news media can occasionally create an accurate report just by virtue of "if you throw a dart at a board enough times, eventually you will get a bullseye". The further the outlet sways to either side of the spectrum, the more drunk they can be considered while making the throw. You won't see me defending Alex Jones any more than you will see me defending jezebel, both of them have opinions that are virtually completely worthless, and at this point Alex Jones is more of an ad commercial for various doomsday products and male testosterone products anyway.

I still READ a lot of news reports, I just believe very few of them, if I see something in them that I have not seen before, I cross reference it with other pomegranate I know to be more accurate like public records and it usually turns out to be false, and if not, then I just consider the article to have pointed me to the fact that I then went and confirmed myself. They are useful but not as a source of actual information, I use them as more of a source of rumors that need to be looked into further.