Crooked Hillary!

the fact you're calling it over without any facts, based purely on what you want this to implicate, is pretty sad.

Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me, but fool me a couple hundred times and I don't have an appropriate hyperbole to end this phrase, you get the idea. Something can only be a "coincidence" so many times before it is no longer a coincidence. I realize at this point that you are beyond convincing of this, and that no matter what happens it's purely circumstantial, but facts will still be facts regardless of individual opinion. It is my opinion that she will go to jail. It is a FACT that she SHOULD be in jail. That's the sole difference here, whether or not she will snake her way out of it is the only variable remaining.

Maybe you should read the link and find out.

Just because it reports something doesn't mean it's legitimate, especially coming from a liberal rag such as that. Going strictly by the letter itself and none of the garbage commentary on it that they are providing, all I can see is Comey is confirming that there is substantial enough evidence to merit reopening the case, and that there is enough of it that it will take a while to process, so she likely won't actually be in prison until at least next year unless the coming week's leaks incriminate her in ways unrelated to the emails they just got. To put it plainly, there is no way they would have reopened the case if it wasn't going to end in an indictment, if she got off twice the damage to their reputation with the American public would be irreparable, they are not willing to throw out all of the trust the organization has ever gained for one woman regardless of how influential she is. This link that you were using as a way to say "you are just buying into the media's garbage" has only further proven my point; it IS garbage, and the garbage starts with the commentary the link itself is making, the only pertinent piece of information in that entire article is the actual letter's contents.