Crooked Hillary!

Not only is that a personal attack, it's not even relevant.
In a classic display of public hubris, I urge you to recuse yourself from this discussion.

I hope you're aware of the irony. You rail against the enforcement of politically correct speech then become upset when someone actually ignores it. While I disagree with the sentiment, I think [MENTION=2088]Flonne[/MENTION];'s own public admissions of paranoia and other mental struggles does make it relevant. Flonne hasn't seemed to think skepticism unreasonable in the past.

I think it's also clear from your (Flonne's) last post that his social circle does not well reflect the majority of Americans. I sincerely doubt that any significant number of people will forgo the comforts of civilization to secede because Hillary becomes president. I similarly doubt anyone will move to Canada if Trump becomes president. People like to talk big and then fail to follow through on their extreme measures because it's bloody inconvenient. There's no mechanism for interconnected communities to partition their utilities to start.

While I think Hillary Clinton is grossly negligent and incompetent regarding her treatment of classified material, my impression from the industry is that isn't entirely unusual for politicians or civil servants. It's also my understanding, and that of my lawyer friends, that incompetence such as this is not actually against the law. Since it doesn't appear that the case will ever see a day in court, we don't have a ruling but there does appear to me to be a reasonable legal interpretation that she is "innocent".