Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
50 All Stat Vs. 30 M.Att
#5
Onion Knight Wrote:If I understand the damage formulae correctly it's all linear anyway so you could brute force it, see how much +1 static INT and +1 static Matk give with your equips on, then compare directly taking into account potential boosts in Matk%, Damage% or INT% from weapon pote as needed, since they're easy to add up. This'd be pretty trivial to find out with some of the worst Alchemy pots (INT potion I and Matk potion I).

Maybe there's a better, more analytical way though.
Oh yeah, good idea. I always forget those potions exist.

MountLag Wrote:(4*INT + LUK) / (4*INT% + LUK%) all stat = MATK / MATK% magic atk
Thanks.


K, so by my math, M.Att is significantly better. That's what I was thinking but I just wanted some confirmation.


Messages In This Thread
50 All Stat Vs. 30 M.Att - by Green4Ever - 2013-11-15, 04:35 PM
50 All Stat Vs. 30 M.Att - by Onion Knight - 2013-11-15, 04:49 PM
50 All Stat Vs. 30 M.Att - by MountLag - 2013-11-15, 04:56 PM
50 All Stat Vs. 30 M.Att - by MountLag - 2013-11-15, 04:59 PM
50 All Stat Vs. 30 M.Att - by Green4Ever - 2013-11-15, 05:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: