Southperry.net
Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Printable Version

+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Main (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Forum: Site Announcements (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Thread: Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 (/showthread.php?tid=42940)

Pages: 1 2 3


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Eos - 2011-06-09

List of minor changes made in the past week or so.
  • Added a 1 blog per calendar day limit. This can be raised per user for users with a legitimate demonstrable need to blog more frequently
  • Added cumulative image size limits to post so that all images in a post can not exceed 1 MB.
  • Added a thread stencil to Amherst to give some ideas on what new users can tell about themselves when they post a hello.
  • Added Groups to the tabs
  • Added last 5 blogs & groups to the home page.




Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - madanthony - 2011-06-11

Hehe. High quality space images can be a bit rough.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Locked - 2011-06-11

So.. we can't post multiple images if it reaches over 1 MB..?


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Rob - 2011-06-11

Can you raise the limit to 2 mbs? 1 mb seems tiny and likely to encourage double posting.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Eos - 2011-06-11

1 mb is more than enough.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Sarah - 2011-06-11

Rob Wrote:Can you raise the limit to 2 mbs? 1 mb seems tiny and likely to encourage double posting.

The point is to discourage posting that many images in the first place.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - MetaSeraphim - 2011-06-11

The final death of mass image dumps in one post.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - FenixR - 2011-06-11

Can we have image autorisizing? sometimes some people post so much high resolution images in sequence that it gets annoying


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Mike - 2011-06-11

Amherst ftw


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - madanthony - 2011-06-11

I'd like to personally take credit for the 1MB thing. My bad, world.

/smug assumption


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Sarah - 2011-06-11

madanthony Wrote:I'd like to personally take credit for the 1MB thing. My bad, world.

/smug assumption

Not even close. Sad


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Eos - 2011-06-11

Sarah Wrote:Not even close. Sad

What date did I announce this was forthcoming to the content testers again?


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Sarah - 2011-06-11

Eosian Wrote:What date did I announce this was forthcoming to the content testers again?

June 5th at 10:46 PM EST!


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - madanthony - 2011-06-11

Let me live in my sad, little, fantasy world! So mean.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - MetaSeraphim - 2011-06-11

madanthony Wrote:Let me live in my sad, little, fantasy world! So mean.

Is it obvious that is my thread that caused this.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Fiel - 2011-06-11

MetaSeraphim Wrote:Is it obvious that is my thread that caused this.

Incorrect. It was this thread.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Eos - 2011-06-11

Fiel Wrote:Incorrect. It was this thread.

Yep yep. That was the last straw. Three times Rolleyes


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Shidoshi - 2011-06-12

I really think 1mb is too little, a lot of images I have are above 1mb by themselves. It wouldn't even have to be an image dump.

Well, I guess we will have to resort to linking to the images instead, though for big images the forum auto-resize already makes it a necessity to open the image on a new window or using the forum image viewer thing.


This could possibly be changed to "maximum 1 image or 1mb, whichever is higher", so you avoid dumps but doesn't cut on higher quality images which may be interesting.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Eos - 2011-06-12

Shidoshi Wrote:I really think 1mb is too little, a lot of images I have are above 1mb by themselves. It wouldn't even have to be an image dump.

Your signature picture is 130 kb. Allowing 8 to 10 of that is hardly denying anyone the ability to post several images.

I can easily post 15 decent sized pics from my camera in less than 1 MB, so I'm not seeing any proof here that we need to allow larger images per post.
Compress it better. tinypic it. Something.

If you compare:
http://www.gamejudgment.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Mudkip.jpg
to:
http://oi53.tinypic.com/9s9i85.jpg

You can post the compressed version of it nearly five times over in a single post.

No one here deserves the right to waste everyone else's bandwidth just because they're too lazy to use an image that isn't practically a RAW BMP.


Minor Changes - 2011-06-11 - Shidoshi - 2011-06-12

Eosian Wrote:Your signature picture is 130 kb. Allowing 8 to 10 of that is hardly denying anyone the ability to post several images.

I can easily post 15 decent sized pics from my camera in less than 1 MB, so I'm not seeing any proof here that we need to allow larger images per post.
Compress it better. tinypic it. Something.

If you compare:
http://www.gamejudgment.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Mudkip.jpg
to:
http://oi53.tinypic.com/9s9i85.jpg

You can post the compressed version of it nearly five times over in a single post.

No one here deserves the right to waste everyone else's bandwidth just because they're too lazy to use an image that isn't practically a RAW BMP.

Except for really gifs, hard to work around those to make them less than 1mb. Also, sometimes a high quality picture taken with a camera is worth seeing in true quality.