Poll: What should the cumulative size limit on images per single post be?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
512k
0%
0 0%
1 MB
20.59%
7 20.59%
2 MB
26.47%
9 26.47%
3 MB
14.71%
5 14.71%
5 MB
38.24%
13 38.24%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Minor Changes - 2011-06-11
#1
List of minor changes made in the past week or so.
  • Added a 1 blog per calendar day limit. This can be raised per user for users with a legitimate demonstrable need to blog more frequently
  • Added cumulative image size limits to post so that all images in a post can not exceed 1 MB.
  • Added a thread stencil to Amherst to give some ideas on what new users can tell about themselves when they post a hello.
  • Added Groups to the tabs
  • Added last 5 blogs & groups to the home page.

It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#2
Hehe. High quality space images can be a bit rough.
Reply
#3
So.. we can't post multiple images if it reaches over 1 MB..?
Reply
#4
Can you raise the limit to 2 mbs? 1 mb seems tiny and likely to encourage double posting.
Reply
#5
1 mb is more than enough.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#6
Rob Wrote:Can you raise the limit to 2 mbs? 1 mb seems tiny and likely to encourage double posting.

The point is to discourage posting that many images in the first place.
Reply
#7
The final death of mass image dumps in one post.
Reply
#8
Can we have image autorisizing? sometimes some people post so much high resolution images in sequence that it gets annoying
Reply
#9
Amherst ftw
Reply
#10
I'd like to personally take credit for the 1MB thing. My bad, world.

/smug assumption
Reply
#11
madanthony Wrote:I'd like to personally take credit for the 1MB thing. My bad, world.

/smug assumption

Not even close. Sad
Reply
#12
Sarah Wrote:Not even close. Sad

What date did I announce this was forthcoming to the content testers again?
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#13
Eosian Wrote:What date did I announce this was forthcoming to the content testers again?

June 5th at 10:46 PM EST!
Reply
#14
Let me live in my sad, little, fantasy world! So mean.
Reply
#15
madanthony Wrote:Let me live in my sad, little, fantasy world! So mean.

Is it obvious that is my thread that caused this.
Reply
#16
MetaSeraphim Wrote:Is it obvious that is my thread that caused this.

Incorrect. It was this thread.
Reply
#17
Fiel Wrote:Incorrect. It was this thread.

Yep yep. That was the last straw. Three times Rolleyes
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#18
I really think 1mb is too little, a lot of images I have are above 1mb by themselves. It wouldn't even have to be an image dump.

Well, I guess we will have to resort to linking to the images instead, though for big images the forum auto-resize already makes it a necessity to open the image on a new window or using the forum image viewer thing.


This could possibly be changed to "maximum 1 image or 1mb, whichever is higher", so you avoid dumps but doesn't cut on higher quality images which may be interesting.
Reply
#19
Shidoshi Wrote:I really think 1mb is too little, a lot of images I have are above 1mb by themselves. It wouldn't even have to be an image dump.

Your signature picture is 130 kb. Allowing 8 to 10 of that is hardly denying anyone the ability to post several images.

I can easily post 15 decent sized pics from my camera in less than 1 MB, so I'm not seeing any proof here that we need to allow larger images per post.
Compress it better. tinypic it. Something.

If you compare:
http://www.gamejudgment.com/wp-content/u...Mudkip.jpg
to:
http://oi53.tinypic.com/9s9i85.jpg

You can post the compressed version of it nearly five times over in a single post.

No one here deserves the right to waste everyone else's bandwidth just because they're too lazy to use an image that isn't practically a RAW BMP.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#20
Eosian Wrote:Your signature picture is 130 kb. Allowing 8 to 10 of that is hardly denying anyone the ability to post several images.

I can easily post 15 decent sized pics from my camera in less than 1 MB, so I'm not seeing any proof here that we need to allow larger images per post.
Compress it better. tinypic it. Something.

If you compare:
http://www.gamejudgment.com/wp-content/u...Mudkip.jpg
to:
http://oi53.tinypic.com/9s9i85.jpg

You can post the compressed version of it nearly five times over in a single post.

No one here deserves the right to waste everyone else's bandwidth just because they're too lazy to use an image that isn't practically a RAW BMP.

Except for really gifs, hard to work around those to make them less than 1mb. Also, sometimes a high quality picture taken with a camera is worth seeing in true quality.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)