Demon Slayer , pro come please =(

if ...

Full lv2 Link Skill + Kaiser and Xenon lv200 Card + Equips and Potential
Cygnus 6 eq [with shoulder]
glove is mulung 2nd Rank [2~10]

STR : 11,000 around
Weapon Wa : 250 around
Weapon potetial = Boss Dmg +60% , Ignore Def 30%
Shield potential = Boss Dmg +60% , Ignore Def 30%

Question :

1. Demon Impact can deal how many dmg per line ? [hilla / pb]

pls help >.<"

I dont have a damage calculator,but are you asking for normal or hard hilla? You could solo normal hilla and find out what damage you do...

I assume Weapon WA you mean only your BW/Axe cause if you're rocking 11K STR, 250 total is... let's say subpar.

But we need total WA to calculate range and then dmg.

I assume Weapon WA you mean only your BW/Axe cause if you're rocking 11K STR 250 total is let's say subpar.

Lol that's what i said when i read that

assuming your attack is around 500 tops (I doubt yo have more than 1k total attack without tyrants/root abyss set and ONLY 250 attack on weapon)

*sigh* Im too lazy to do the maths right now

now my eq still clean and havent potential , just want to know can deal how many dmg with thoes eq ,
i can screan shoot my eq n post here ? o.o

I find it pointless to do theoretical calculations like this, but it'd be something like this, I guess:



Might've forgotten some stuff, not sure if Insult to Injury or Kanna and DA's links are additive.

I think there's a glitch in that chart somewhere, since 528k X 1.5 maxcrit X 4.3 multiplier = 3.4M crit on normal attacks @ 0% def.

I think there's a glitch in that chart somewhere, since 528k X 1.5 maxcrit X 4.3 multiplier = 3.4M crit on normal attacks @ 0% def.

Demon Impact does 330% per hit, which isn't reflected on the range portion.

Demon Impact does 330% per hit, which isn't reflected on the range portion.

Oh wait I forgot that the bosses had physical resistance.

Sorry my bad

my eq , [cant post more than 2mb]
so 1 by 1




---------- Post added at 08:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:16 PM ----------



and this

* i hear people say addition potential +wa better.
but i think my eq all from [gacha magic box]
with high str , so the addition potential +str% is better ?

# i got a screenshoot is a cannon weapon, addition potential [Unique]
and have Total DMG 9%
that mean when [Legend] can be 12%


so , str % > wa ? when high STR and high STR%

so , str % > wa ? when high STR and high STR%

made for a basil question, hope my math checks out

 Spoiler

in retrospect it would have been better to do it the other way around instead of inverting the whole thing at the end
ideally you want your number to be the same as the cost of 1 extra %stat divided by the cost of 1 extra att

This might help you for this very specific question

The most accurate analysis can only come if you list out, nicely, on an Excel file every single damn source of damage and stuff, including your standard buffs, then add them up. Then we can recommend to you what to get.

But like iAmFear has said, there's very little point in such calculations.

Hadriel

(100% + %str) %str = watk WA @ 0 dex

sry im too .. noob for my math and english

sry im too .. noob for my math and english

100 125 150 175 is ATT

I'll do a few boxes for you:
If you have 0% STR and 100 ATT, +1% STR = +0.978776ATT
If you have 60%STR and 300ATT, +1% STR = +1.8499ATT
If you have 300%STR and 700ATT, +1%STR = +1.7406ATT

hope this helps

u can teach me the formula?

u chart is using :
_______Str____Dex
Base___999____4
Other__200____100

S mean base STR + Other ?

A mean Att , (inclue skill ?)

..

and ...

the ((((a+1)/a)*(4*s*(1+p/100)+d)-d)/4-s)/(s/100)-p

how to count , i count the number no same .. i think i count wrong..

((((a+1)/a)*(4*s*(1+p/100)+d)-d)/4-s)/(s/100)-p

mean

(a+1)/a)*(4*s(1+p)/100)+d) = 123456 i random put a number
(123456-d)/4-s=123321
123321/(s/100)-p = ans ?

or

((((a+1)/a)*(4*s*(1+p/100)+d)-d)/4-s)/(s/100)-p
=(a+1)/a)*(4*s*(1+p/100)+d)-d)/4-s)/(s/100)-p this count 1st
then only * (a+1)/a) ?


sry i don;t know the (((( mean

Don't use that formula. The formula is correct, but there's a much simpler way to express it. When there's a +d next to -d, you can probably figure out that that expression is probably something you do not want to deal with.
That's like saying 6^2 = 1+3+5+7+9 or 2^6 = 6C0 + 6C1 + 6C2 + 6C3 + 6C4 + 6C5 + 6C6. It's easier to just deal with the 6^2 or 2^6.

The simplified version is
a * s / 25 / [4*s*(1+p/100)+d]

help me make this 9 chart , ^^"



thanks