are they trying to kill the original mages

I like to train on mages, my first mage is the i/l thn the blaze wiz and after that the evan and now i'm training a battle mages. with each mages i see there skills are getting better, they level faster their mobs skills are better and they have great support skills, better dps .... i'm even consider switching to a bam as my main although i'm 186 i/l mage. with the way things are going for my ice mages and all the nerfs what is the point, a skill that hits 3 and skill with a charge and an other with a cooldown. death to the O.G mages how nice

I feel that they are simply perfecting what could have been if they had the ideas/technology they did when the mages were first made. I made a FP mage in El Nido to 100 before BaMs came out, and I enjoyed it a lot. I like the increased damage with explosion compared to before, and teleport mastery is amazing.
I don't think they're killing the original mages, they just want to try something new.

^ what he said. just like aran and wild hunters. they took the flaws of the original class, work it all out and introduce a better one..

Yes. Just like Arans killed all the other warriors, evans killed all the mages the first time, and dual bladers killed all previous theives.

Except none of these happened, and this comes up every time a new class comes out. No one is killing/trying to kill anything

^ what he said. just like aran and wild hunters. they took the flaws of the original class, work it all out and introduce a better one..

How did Aran fix any "flaws" of warrior classes? Dark Knights are better than Arans now. Wild hunters? They are on the weakest end of all archer classes on the DPM charts, because Marksman and Bow master still completely own at DPM. I guess Wild hunter getting stance is a little cheap, but it is not better than a Bow master

How did Aran fix any "flaws" of warrior classes? Dark Knights are better than Arans now. Wild hunters? They are on the weakest end of all archer classes on the DPM charts, because Marksman and Bow master still completely own at DPM. I guess Wild hunter getting stance is a little cheap, but it is not better than a Bow master

Everything is about damage aint it ?

Everything is about damage aint it ?

Well, I just assume when someone talks about a class being better than the other, they are talking about DPM of both classes being compared to see who is better.

Dual Bladers are able to go across maps way faster than NLs, and they can attack way faster, based on what I've seen. Yeah.

How did Aran fix any "flaws" of warrior classes? Dark Knights are better than Arans now. Wild hunters? They are on the weakest end of all archer classes on the DPM charts, because Marksman and Bow master still completely own at DPM. I guess Wild hunter getting stance is a little cheap, but it is not better than a Bow master

First of all Wild Hunter is at the top of the DPM charts for Archers.. I don't know what your smoking. Arans were a nice new addition that gave people who enjoy fast warriors a class to play, along with a little less boring button smashing (Heros are probably the most boring Warrior ever in my opinion).. they fixed ALOT of warrior flaws..

First of all Wild Hunter is at the top of the DPM charts for Archers.. I don't know what your smoking. Arans were a nice new addition that gave people who enjoy fast warriors a class to play, along with a little less boring button smashing (Heros are probably the most boring Warrior ever in my opinion).. they fixed ALOT of warrior flaws..

If you looked at the calculations, you would have noticed Marksman and Bowmaster are higher DPM than wildhunter.

If you looked at the calculations, you would have noticed Marksman and Bowmaster are higher DPM than wildhunter.

?!?!

http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php...post623795