Zard or Onyx Blade?

Well I have a lvl 45 Dawn Warrior and I noticed something odd when I equip my Onyx Blade.
First of all, my Onyx Blade gives 67 atk whereas my Zard gives 60atk but when I equip the Onyx Blade, my damage range in the stat window decreases by a bit going from 440 min damage to 419 min dmge, likewise with the max damage (forgot how much dmge it was but I'm sure it decreased)

Is this normal or a bug?

Well I have a lvl 45 Dawn Warrior and I noticed something odd when I equip my Onyx Blade.
First of all, my Onyx Blade gives 67 atk whereas my Zard gives 60atk but when I equip the Onyx Blade, my damage range in the stat window decreases by a bit going from 440 min damage to 419 min dmge, likewise with the max damage (forgot how much dmge it was but I'm sure it decreased)

Is this normal or a bug?

General Formula
MAX = (Primary Stat + Secondary Stat) * Weapon Attack / 100
MIN = (Primary Stat * 0.9 * Skill Mastery + Secondary Stat) * Weapon Attack / 100


One Handed Sword
Primary: STR * 4.0
Secondary: DEX

Two Handed Sword
Primary: STR * 4.6
Secondary: DEX

.

So each type of weapon have a hidden attribute? :f6:
In this case the primary stats and the secondary stats

So each type of weapon have a hidden attribute? :f6:
In this case the primary stats and the secondary stats

You can't view this in-game, so I guess yes, it is hidden in a way. It's general knowledge by now though. It's called damage multiplier, iirc. Same amount of Str is multiplied by 4.0 when using a 1hand sword and 4.6 when using a 2hand sword, resulting in different values.
Primary and secondary stats are visible on stats window ('A' by default, iirc). For warriors, it's str and dex respectively. (remember to multiply str by the corresponding weapon's multiplier)

E.g:
100str
10dex
60atk Zard
67atk Onyx
=> Zard: (100*4.6 + 10)*60/100 = 282 max dmg
=> Onyx: (100*4.0 + 10)*67/100 = 264.7 max dmg

Onyx is faster and better-looking though.

Oh alrite then.
Thanks for the info

Hmm, I knew that two-handed swords were better, but I never undestood why. UNTIL NOW!! Seriously though.

Hmm, I knew that two-handed swords were better, but I never undestood why. UNTIL NOW!! Seriously though.

Speed difference can easily make up for this.

too true. its better to pummel an opponent to a pulp repeatedly than to crush them in a single blow. get to savor the carnage.

 under debate

While we're on this matter, I have a question at hand.

(780*4+60)*(1.2[corlor=rainbow]+1[/color])*95.2381=666285.748
A 120atk lunchbox = 666,285.748 dpm.

(785*4+60)*(x[corlor=rainbow]+1[/color])*86.9565=666285.748
x = 1.394
You need a 140 atk speed5 weapon to beat 666,285.748 dpm.

May I humbly ask where he got the (watk + 1) multiplier from? He seems too ridiculously confident to simply have made a minor mistake.
As far as I can recall correctly the formula is: (str*multiplier + dex)*watk = max dmg, not (watk + 1). Am I missing out on some details?

My calculations would go as followed:

Lunchbox: (785*4 + 60)*1.2*95.2381 = 365714.304 dpm
Other swords: (785*4 + 60)*x*86.9565 = 365714.304 dpm => x = 1.31428611.