KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster
#1
Want instant notification of new extractions, announcements and updates? Follow Southperry on Twitter!

How do you feel about the content changed in this patch? Click on "Rate this thread" in the upper right-hand corner of this thread to share your opinion!

-----

Usually for KMS threads I try to find things that are substantially different from the KMST counterpart. I'm really struggling to find much of a difference in anything big. So this thread will be quite short. If you'd like to read more about Angelic Burster, [thread=58574]see my other thread[/thread].

Other Changes:
- Magnus's HP is still labeled with question marks.

 NXWatch

 (PvE) Skill Changes
Reply
#2
pineapple.

Edit: Yeah, why don't you warn me while I edit my post. K? ok. I didn't really come prepared.

[Image: SkhC7.jpg]
Reply
#3
Oh ma lawd. They are releasing these classes rather quickly.. Time to log into KMS I guess Big Grin

Guess I got my hopes up too soon.
Reply
#4
What's with the rushing? @_@


Maybe they put the data in and aren't ready to release it? But today is a Thursday and they always do content updates on Thursdays... There's not much delay time there.
Reply
#5
Angelic Buster isn't until next week...at least I believe so.
This could probably just be a case of porting data so the patch next week won't need to be massive?
Reply
#6
They probably plan on doing a 10 minute like patch or post-midnight ban unlock.
Reply
#7
MapleStory 5 years ago: OMG ANOTHER CLASS WAT IS THIS MADNESS
Now: Oh. Another class. Yay.
Reply
#8
Sewil Wrote:MapleStory 5 years ago: OMG ANOTHER CLASS WAT IS THIS MADNESS
Now: Oh. Another class. Yay. Not another class =_______=

I'd prefer them to work on the game mechanics itself and actual content(PQs for example) rather than more jobs. I don't mean potentials either, there's already way too much of that..
Reply
#9
Hmm, first with Kaiser and now this...don't you normally put the class as the thread title only when the KMS patch actually releases the class? or is that the actual extracted patch name?

Kinda misleading.
Reply
#10
xallista Wrote:Hmm, first with Kaiser and now this...don't you normally put the class as the thread title only when the KMS patch actually releases the class? or is that the actual extracted patch name?

Kinda misleading.

He names the patch based upon the content, not on Nexon Korea's scheduling.
Reply
#11
Raul Wrote:He names the patch based upon the content, not on Nexon Korea's scheduling.

Now you're confusing me, lol. The thread is named angelic burster but the class itself isn't part of the patch's contents?

Well its just a minor detail but still...
Reply
#12
xallista Wrote:Now you're confusing me, lol. The thread is named angelic burster but the class itself isn't part of the patch's contents?

Well its just a minor detail but still...

Well, Burster data has been implanted into the official game, just like what happened last time. That's why it's named Burster. Fiel never mentioned that.
Reply
#13
xallista Wrote:Now you're confusing me, lol. The thread is named angelic burster but the class itself isn't part of the patch's contents?

Well its just a minor detail but still...

ask yourself: what does this patch contain?

that's what fiel will call it. this patch contains angelic burster, then that's the name the patch gets, wether it is getting released or not with this patch is irrelevant.
Reply
#14
Sewil Wrote:MapleStory 5 years ago: OMG ANOTHER CLASS WAT IS THIS MADNESS
Now: Oh. Another class. Yay.

They should just take all the already existing classes, make them permanent, finish adding classes to the races that don't have all 5, and then simply work on improving the existing classes.

Too bad they won't, and the only new content they add includes a hefty amount of fake difficulty. Like the invincible Magnus.
Reply
#15
Arrol Wrote:Well, Burster data has been implanted into the official game, just like what happened last time. That's why it's named Burster. Fiel never mentioned that.

Did you read the name of the thread? Why would I create the name of the thread for something that isn't in the patch?

EDIT: Nevermind. I can be an idiot sometimes.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)