2012-04-23, 03:01 PM
Thanks Eos and donators for temporarily satisfying my eternal curiosity about things that probably won't ever matter
|
Nexon Legal Action Donation Drive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
   
2012-04-23, 04:02 PM
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-05-05, 04:37 PM
Note both active cases have been updated and our legal research fund is back to empty.
If you're enjoying the documents please feel free to contribute towards getting more as they become available.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-06-11, 09:52 PM
There've been some protective orders, a disclosure and a joint discovery report on these since our last update and funds depletion.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
 
2012-06-11, 09:59 PM
Guh. I might have to donate when i get paid this week then. Seems important.
2012-06-11, 10:01 PM
Sarah Wrote:Protective orders? COLOUR ME INTRIGUED. Yeah I am totally pondering those myself. The one that went through is on Nexon America Inc. et al v. Gameanarchy LLC et al.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-06-12, 01:09 AM
lol
Did anyone else see this? Is there a reason they would forget the online part and then say MMORPG? I just thought it was funny.Also I'm pretty sure there are 2 "Count IX" anyways very interesting read. Thank you for donating and thank you for obtaining this. Sorry I can't help the cause.
2012-06-22, 02:49 PM
Untradeable Wrote:Any new information popped up yet? Several but the fund's run dry. Aside from protective orders there've been two motions to dismiss on Nexon America Inc. et al v. Ryan Michael Cornwall et al, as well as the results of mediation. The other is stalled at it's own protective order(s).
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-06-22, 02:50 PM
Eos Wrote:Several but the fund's run dry. You think there's anything interesting in these?
2012-06-22, 03:06 PM
Untradeable Wrote:You think there's anything interesting in these? Interesting is in the eye of the beholder. Who filed a protective order and for what? Who wanted to dismiss the case, assumably the defendant, but on what grounds and was it rejected?
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-06-22, 03:13 PM
Eos Wrote:Interesting is in the eye of the beholder. Well, I guess i'm pretty curious. I sent in another $25.00. Do what you can with it 
2012-06-23, 08:46 PM
Updated, surprisingly little for all we got.
Best part by far was the "You can't sue me cause everyone else does it too" attempt at rebuttal on the Ryan one. Oi.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-06-23, 08:54 PM
Lame. So they can just say something's confidential and boop, we cant see it.
2012-06-23, 08:56 PM
Untradeable Wrote:Lame. So they can just say something's confidential and boop, we cant see it. Judge has to agree, so they can't go redacting everything willy-nilly.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-06-24, 03:31 PM
Sarah Wrote:Did you post the new ones? Not seeing them. They're in their designated threads, in the OP, marked with the [new][/new]flag.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-08-16, 11:07 AM
Current Case Updates we haven't obtained yet;
Ryan Cormichael et al;
Gameanarchy; Notice of Assignment of Panel Mediator (uninteresting, generally)
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2012-08-16, 11:17 AM
Eos Wrote:Current Case Updates we haven't obtained yet; Any of those actually worth getting? I'm not developed enough in legal to know what is juicy and what isn't 
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: 30k3l9z.jpg]](http://i45.tinypic.com/30k3l9z.jpg)
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)