Posting Freak
Posts: 2,820
Threads: 130
Joined: 2008-07
Looking for any corrections to what I think is true about the rings
1. The rings drop in recipe form only
2. They drop from akyrum only
3. You can only wear 1 set at a time i.e. You cannot wear the immortal hero set and the eternal hero set at the same time (total of 4 rings)
Senior Member
Posts: 467
Threads: 34
Joined: 2009-07
Kaasoljoyyx Wrote:Looking for any corrections to what I think is true about the rings
1. The rings drop in recipe form only
2. They drop from akyrum only
3. You can only wear 1 set at a time i.e. You cannot wear the immortal hero set and the eternal hero set at the same time (total of 4 rings)
3. I think that's false, but no use getting 2 sets in the first place
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,181
Threads: 64
Joined: 2010-11
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
Country Flag: denmark
IGN: 워우
Server: Culverin
Level: 17x
Job: Dual Blader
Guild: 불타-
1 and 2 are true.
I don't know about 3, though I can't see why you wouldn't be able to, as they are two different sets.
Senior Member
Posts: 275
Threads: 8
Joined: 2011-08
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
Country Flag: California
IGN: Brandonaught
Server: Scania
Level: 212
Job: Paladin
Guild: Chrono
Guild Alliance: Chrono
Farm: Sheep GYM
i have a hunch getting the rings will be very difficult, about as difficult as getting a manon familiar card.
3. I dont think these rings work like the rings from the lvl 70 events.
Posting Freak
Posts: 2,820
Threads: 130
Joined: 2008-07
hongyu Wrote:3. I think that's false, but no use getting 2 sets in the first place
Since they're all potentiable, I think they're better than evo rings and etc.
Senior Member
Posts: 362
Threads: 18
Joined: 2008-08
Kaasoljoyyx Wrote:Since they're all potentiable, I think they're better than evo rings and etc.
They are. Potential is almost always better than non-potential.
Posting Freak
Posts: 18,970
Threads: 319
Joined: 2008-07
Kaasoljoyyx Wrote:Since they're all potentiable, I think they're better than evo rings and etc.
If you wanted to use that argument you might as well get an allmighty ring. All two ring sets would get you is the +25 all stat bonus twice plus whatever is on the ring itself.
Senior Member
Posts: 572
Threads: 1
Joined: 2010-11
Takebacker Wrote:If you wanted to use that argument you might as well get an allmighty ring. All two ring sets would get you is the +25 all stat bonus twice plus whatever is on the ring itself. I rather the 25 all stats and 10 attk/mattk(one ring comes with 2 attk/mattk) if both rings are equipped and have pot stats over an almighty ring with no attk/mattk.
Posting Freak
Posts: 18,970
Threads: 319
Joined: 2008-07
Jerry-Boyle Wrote:I rather the 15 all stats and 10 attk/mattk(one ring comes with 2 attk/mattk) if both rings are equipped with pot stats over an almighty ring with no attk.
It isn't attack/magic attack. It's attack OR magic attack.
Senior Member
Posts: 572
Threads: 1
Joined: 2010-11
Takebacker Wrote:It isn't attack/magic attack. It's attack OR magic attack. I know and that's what I meant to do
Posting Freak
Posts: 18,970
Threads: 319
Joined: 2008-07
Still, i don't think an extra set of rings that only get you another +25 all stats is more effective than an allmighty ring/crit ring and an evo ring.
Senior Member
Posts: 572
Threads: 1
Joined: 2010-11
Takebacker Wrote:Still, i don't think an extra set of rings that only get you another +25 all stats is more effective than an allmighty ring/crit ring and an evo ring. Lucky you, I only have two 17 rings, resistance ring and ABR. Sacrificing one evo ring and the resistance ring would work well for me. Instead of 10 all stats and 7 mattk: it would be 25 all stats and 12 mattk, let alone both rings will be potable which is needed since none of my rings have that.
For your situation though, current set-up seems the best/better then mine currently.
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,181
Threads: 64
Joined: 2010-11
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
Country Flag: denmark
IGN: 워우
Server: Culverin
Level: 17x
Job: Dual Blader
Guild: 불타-
Takebacker Wrote:Still, i don't think an extra set of rings that only get you another +25 all stats is more effective than an allmighty ring/crit ring and an evo ring. if you can afford the immortal ring set, the extra 25 stats will benefit you more than almighty/crit ring, due to your total potential stats(assuming you have w/m.atk and %stat ratio even)
Posting Freak
Posts: 18,970
Threads: 319
Joined: 2008-07
Jerry-Boyle Wrote:Lucky you, I only have two 17 rings, resistance ring and ABR. Sacrificing one evo ring and the resistance ring would work well for me. Instead of 10 all stats and 7 mattk: it would be 25 all stats and 12 mattk, let alone both rings will be potable which is needed since none of my rings have that.
For your situation though, current set-up seems the best/better then mine currently.
I don't have an allmighty ring, nor do i think it's worth it given it's stats compared to immortal hero. It seems you think i have one when i don't. Just clarifying.
I would replace my ABR and an evo ring on my bucc, move the evo ring to my cannoneer, and take off the legendary ring on him to make room for two sets of rings on both characters. Rather not have to cube 8 rings to legendary when i already have to do 4.
Senior Member
Posts: 467
Threads: 34
Joined: 2009-07
Takebacker Wrote:If you wanted to use that argument you might as well get an allmighty ring. All two ring sets would get you is the +25 all stat bonus twice plus whatever is on the ring itself.
wasn't it +15 all stat lol
Posting Freak
Posts: 8,478
Threads: 128
Joined: 2008-07
Gender: Neuter
Country Flag: canada
IGN: Oooh
Server: Bera
Job: Empress
Farm: Stereo
hongyu Wrote:wasn't it +15 all stat lol Each ring's 5-all, plus set bonus of 15 (and the matk which isn't helpful)
Senior Member
Posts: 467
Threads: 34
Joined: 2009-07
Stereo Wrote:Each ring's 5-all, plus set bonus of 15 (and the matk which isn't helpful)
I guess it would depend from class to class then, since crit ring gives me a static 4.19%, while if I cubed the eternal hero ring to 9%. I would only gain approx a bit less 3% advantage since my dex by then would be around 200%+100%(default), also since I scrolled almighty ring with attack, with it's 1 slot it should count as enough to beat 5/5/5/5 considering it began with 2/2/2/2 anyways. I have total of 1.5k dex pre potential which means 20 to all(set+1 more ring) would count for about 1.3% more stats. In the end it would give me 4.339% total, but then considering that 9% dex is a bit lower than 3% total boost they are about even. When you think about it. If I upgrade some more items, it makes the almighty+crit combo better again, since crit is static and almighty ring is better than 1 of the rings obviously. It's just really a matter of 10% crit chance.vs.20 to all, you can still scroll the 2nd eternal hero ring with attack. But with only 3 slots. you are barely going to get anything anyways, and even if you do you are barely going to get 1% total boost anyways.
Posting Freak
Posts: 2,820
Threads: 130
Joined: 2008-07
Is it possible to wear say 2 immortal sets at the same time? i.e. you wear the 2 rings for the set bonus, then you put on another set of those exact 2 rings
Trying to figure out what would be the best 4 ring combo.
Senior Member
Posts: 362
Threads: 18
Joined: 2008-08
Kaasoljoyyx Wrote:Is it possible to wear say 2 immortal sets at the same time? i.e. you wear the 2 rings for the set bonus, then you put on another set of those exact 2 rings
Trying to figure out what would be the best 4 ring combo.
If I recall correctly they were all unique equippable items, so you cannot wear two of the same ring. You can however wear the the two sets at the same time.
Senior Member
Posts: 467
Threads: 34
Joined: 2009-07
Kaasoljoyyx Wrote:Is it possible to wear say 2 immortal sets at the same time? i.e. you wear the 2 rings for the set bonus, then you put on another set of those exact 2 rings
Trying to figure out what would be the best 4 ring combo.
unique equipped items, so no
|