2011-12-17, 03:34 AM
[video=youtube;Ocj_sGKFOIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ocj_sGKFOIA#![/video]
|
John Stamos' Guide to Cuddling
|
|
2011-12-17, 03:34 AM
[video=youtube;Ocj_sGKFOIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ocj_sGKFOIA#![/video]
2011-12-17, 10:22 PM
No one cares if it's old or you've seen it before.
Hilarious. I came up with like 14 Full House jokes while watching that video. Stamos snugglefist.
2011-12-18, 12:04 AM
i am somewhat uncofortable. video was hilarious though, especially the ending.
2011-12-18, 01:25 AM
Kalovale Wrote:I'm not even going to click that. Not even with this burning curiosity.Oh there's something burning alright, but it isn't curiosity.
2011-12-18, 02:19 AM
madanthony Wrote:Oh there's something burning alright, but it isn't curiosity.
2011-12-18, 02:57 AM
Sarah Wrote:No one cares if it's old or you've seen it before. Ah just like no one cares that you find it hilarious? Your opinion not > my opinion.It is a funny video, but I don't feel I deserve ridicule for following up with Collegehumor Mon-Friday while I'm at school.
2011-12-18, 03:04 AM
CrazyForDex Wrote:Ah just like no one cares that you find it hilarious? Your opinion does not > my opinion. My opinion certainly does greater than your opinion. It does the most greater than.
2011-12-18, 03:06 AM
CrazyForDex Wrote:Ah just like no one cares that you find it hilarious? Your opinion does not > my opinion.What was the purpose of you pointing out that it's an old video? Posting for the sake of posting?
2011-12-18, 03:15 AM
Providence Wrote:What was the purpose of you pointing out that it's an old video? Posting for the sake of posting? Yes I suppose it was for the same reason that you then asked me why I posted. Which would also be the same reason why I am answering you.
2011-12-18, 03:26 AM
CrazyForDex Wrote:Yes I suppose it was for the same reason that you then asked me why I posted. Which would also be the same reason why I am answering you.Asking a non-rhetorical question in a thread seems to be quite a bit different than pointing out that the thread's subject is old. The former anticipates a reply which continues the thread (though not necessarily in the intended course). The latter is never of any value. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|