Six hundred million gamers could be war criminals, Red Cross says

I was going to post this in current events, but it seems more appropriate here.

THE Red Cross is investigating whether 600 million gamers are violating the Hague and Geneva conventions when they kill and blow stuff up for fun. Delegates at the 31st International Conference of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Red Crescent raised the concerns over the potential “International Humanitarian Law” violations

“Exactly how video games influence individuals is a hotly debated topic, but for the first time, Movement partners discussed our role and responsibility to take action against violations of IHL in video games,” the Red Cross wrote in its daily bulletin.

“While National Societies shared their experiences and opinions, there is clearly no simple answer. There is, however, an overall consensus and motivation to take action.”A spokesperson for ICRC Australia told news.com.au the workshop looked at how games “represented International Humanitarian Law”, which regulates the legal conduct of warfare.

"The aim for the ICRC is that they send the right signals to their hundreds of millions of players by rewarding respect for IHL and penalising violations," the spokesperson said.

The Red Cross said if it finds the conventions have been violated, they may ask game developers to conform to international laws or encourage governments to create laws that regulate the gaming industry, Kotaku reported.
But international law professor at the University of New South Wales Anthony Billingsley told news.com.au the Red Cross risked trivialising the conventions of warfare.

Mr Billingsley also said there is no way the conventions could apply to individuals because they were state-based. “There are concerns about the blurring of fantasy and reality,” he said. “There’s a danger of war becoming a spectator sport. People need to realise that this is real stuff.”

The International Committee of the Red Cross is empowered by the Geneva Conventions to protect victims of international and domestic armed conflicts.

Article: http://www.news.com.au/technology/gaming...z1fxIE5xhs

Red Cross Buletin: http://www.rcrcconference.org/docs_upl/e...n_3_EN.pdf

Up next:
Scientist ask for games to use real physics to prevent gamers from using bladeguns and the likes in real life.

....

Next, people will be prohibited from having dreams about violent stuff.

lol.

>yurop
stopped reading there

Word do not and can not describe how UTTERLY pineappleING STUPID this is

The thing these articles NEVER mention is the fact that in the event of a zombie apocalypse, gamers are the only ones we can truly rely on.

The thing these articles NEVER mention is the fact that in the event of a zombie apocalypse, gamers are the only ones we can truly rely on.

I think I would throw in my cards with someone like Dale over a gamer. Gamer might have the knowledge of what to do, but the execution of that knowledge would leave a lot to be desired.

The thing these articles NEVER mention is the fact that in the event of a zombie apocalypse, gamers are the only ones we can truly rely on.

Not true at all, actually gamers would probably be the first ones to die lmfao. And it isn't fitness, it's truly inaccurate information. Go ahead, name a weapon you would ultimately prefer during a zombie invasion

Not true at all, actually gamers would probably be the first ones to die lmfao. And it isn't fitness, it's truly inaccurate information. Go ahead, name a weapon you would ultimately prefer during a zombie invasion

A giant purple dildo.

A giant purple dildo.

....What brand?

I play MW3. Im now a war vet.

Does this mean my college gets payed for by the government now?

I play MW3. Im now a war vet.

Does this mean my college gets payed for by the government now?

We have on our record that you not only slaughtered your team during a mission and killed multiple civilians by shooting gernade launchers irresponsibly.

..You'll start as a Captain

....What brand?

This is exactly the drawback you outlined for gaming misinformation, only that it's applied back to you. Real life marketing schemes have brainwashed our population into judging quality in terms of brand popularity.
The truth is that any giant purple dildo will suffice. The more giant and/or purple it is, the better.

This just in, human race its stoopid

This is exactly the drawback you outlined for gaming misinformation, only that it's applied back to you. Real life marketing schemes have brainwashed our population into judging quality in terms of brand popularity.
The truth is that any giant purple dildo will suffice. The more giant and/or purple it is, the better.

You misunderstand, I'm determining if he's using a popular brand name, they cut corners and use a softer material than the other less popular brands

You misunderstand, I'm determining if he's using a popular brand name, they cut corners and use a softer material than the other less popular brands

Soooo... the worse the brand, the better it is as a weapon? Me guta

Cheap and deadly, just what you need during a zombie apocalypse

We have on our record that you not only slaughtered your team during a mission and killed multiple civilians by shooting gernade launchers irresponsibly.

..You'll start as a Captain

For the record, those civilians gave me a funny look.

For the record, those civilians gave me a funny look.

That sounds medal worthy