Nexon Unleashes ‘Sudden Attack’
#1
More...

Business Wire Wrote:LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nexon America unveils 'Sudden Attack', an online first person shooter, as part of its growing game portfolio

[Image: digg.gif] [Image: delicious.gif] [Image: newsvine.png] [Image: reddit.png] [Image: google.png] [Image: yahoo.png] [Image: emailthis.png]
[Image: img.phdo?p=1][Image: pixel?code=PheedoServ&partnerID=167&key=segment]
Reply
#2
[video=youtube;n--EsAB1h14]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n--EsAB1h14[/video]

Looks terrible...
Reply
#3
Ryukiroku Wrote:[video=youtube;n--EsAB1h14]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n--EsAB1h14[/video]

Looks terrible...
Looks like every other FPS on the market. Looking at you CoD..
Reply
#4
Can't be bothered to look into details but is there much of a difference between this and Combat Arms...?
Reply
#5
sdklg;hj THAT TRAILER IS LOUD AS HELL OH MY GOD

also, it looks like the baby of call of duty and counter strike 1.6
Reply
#6
Its popular in Japan though..

Don't know how well it will do here though.
Reply
#7
Counter Strike?
Reply
#8
Even the knife slice had camera shake in that trailer.
Reply
#9
Looks like a generic fps. Frown
Hopefully those weren't the max graphics in the trailer... Rolleyes
Reply
#10
Ryukiroku Wrote:Looks terrible...

Indeed.
Reply
#11
SwordStaker Wrote:Looks like every other FPS on the market. Looking at you CoD..

I play CoD. This looks nothing like it. Not even slightly.

Anyways, game looks terrible. I'd probably have more fun playing Brink or Duke Nukem, and those games won't have Nexon to deal with when playing.
Reply
#12
I don't see a big difference between this and combat arms.
Reply
#13
I tried it, it's horrible.

Think of Call of Duty Modern Warfare, then think of it being watered down. I got headshotted somehow by every gun, almost every time I stepped out of cover.
Plus the fact that the gamemodes are stale and some are just not fair. Siege mode involves capturing a point and holding it, let's say your team gets down to the last 30 seconds required to hold a point.
If the other team captures, it entirely resets the timer. This means a match could essentially go on forever.

The events are broken as far as I know, since new people don't get what nexon said they would.

I can't justify this game at all, it's horrible. You can't even scope with any gun aside from the sniper rifle.

Combat Arms is better then this. Even with the hackers in it.
Reply
#14
Lol I've played my fair share of shitty fps's, but that one probably looks like the worst I've seen.
Reply
#15
Zangash Wrote:I play CoD. This looks nothing like it. Not even slightly.

Anyways, game looks terrible. I'd probably have more fun playing Brink or Duke Nukem, and those games won't have Nexon to deal with when playing.
Every CoD game is just a copy and paste of it's predacesor. Especially mw2>mw3. You add a new story recolor the menu and some new maps. Yeahnothanks..

Ot:Is this game still in beta? Or is it officially launched.
Reply
#16
SwordStaker Wrote:Every CoD game is just a copy and paste of it's predacesor. Especially mw2>mw3. You add a new story recolor the menu and some new maps. Yeahnothanks..

Ot:Is this game still in beta? Or is it officially launched.

Despite how truly wrong that statement is, I didn't say anything about it being a new game or anything even like it. I just said this looks nothing like CoD. I love how everyone seems oh-so-happy to jump all over CoD and bash it just because it's several times more successful than whatever crappy game you might be a fan of.

Anyways, this shooter looks like crap. I wonder how many months it'll take for it to get shut down.
Reply
#17
Zangash Wrote:Despite how truly wrong that statement is, I didn't say anything about it being a new game or anything even like it. I just said this looks nothing like CoD. I love how everyone seems oh-so-happy to jump all over CoD and bash it just because it's several times more successful than whatever crappy game you might be a fan of.

Anyways, this shooter looks like crap. I wonder how many months it'll take for it to get shut down.
Battlefield. /end of that

I think people aren't giving it enough credit. If it's still in beta give it some time to iron out. It might surprise you
Reply
#18
SwordStaker Wrote:Battlefield. /end of that

I think people aren't giving it enough credit. If it's still in beta give it some time to iron out. It might surprise you

Battlefield? You mean the game that EA was hyping to be a CoD killer and talked massive loads of trash only to take it all back when they got destroyed before MW3 even came out?

The game is already out in other countries, so that gameplay looks to be the final version. Besides that, simple ironing out wouldn't be enough to fix it. Ironing out is what Skyrim needed after release to fix a few bugs. This game just needs a complete overhaul.
Reply
#19
Zangash Wrote:Battlefield? You mean the game that EA was hyping to be a CoD killer and talked massive loads of trash only to take it all back when they got destroyed before MW3 even came out?

The game is already out in other countries, so that gameplay looks to be the final version. Besides that, simple ironing out wouldn't be enough to fix it. Ironing out is what Skyrim needed after release to fix a few bugs. This game just needs a complete overhaul.

I still prefer Battlefield to CoD even though it got destroyed. Yes, I own Cods 4 to...7, too.
Balrog Wrote:I tried it, it's horrible.

Think of Call of Duty Modern Warfare, then think of it being watered down. I got headshotted somehow by every gun, almost every time I stepped out of cover.
Plus the fact that the gamemodes are stale and some are just not fair. Siege mode involves capturing a point and holding it, let's say your team gets down to the last 30 seconds required to hold a point.
If the other team captures, it entirely resets the timer. This means a match could essentially go on forever.

The events are broken as far as I know, since new people don't get what nexon said they would.

I can't justify this game at all, it's horrible. You can't even scope with any gun aside from the sniper rifle.

Combat Arms is better then this. Even with the hackers in it.

You can't scope in Counter Strike, either, but it's one of the old greatest FPS of all time.
Reply
#20
Corn Wrote:I still prefer Battlefield to CoD even though it got destroyed. Yes, I own Cods 4 to...7, too.

Same here
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)