2011-05-29, 08:18 PM
Mute Wrote:Funny, I don't see the joke.
Considering Sarah made it less than 10 posts ago you must be pretty blind.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
| Poll: Funhouse vs Frivolous Things You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| I prefer the funhouse not come back at all. | 10 | 12.35% | |
| I am OK with Frivolous Things replacing the Funhouse | 62 | 76.54% | |
| I am not willing to settle for either option and will just leave. | 9 | 11.11% | |
| Total | 81 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Funhouse & other Frivolous Things
|
|
2011-05-29, 08:18 PM
Mute Wrote:Funny, I don't see the joke. Considering Sarah made it less than 10 posts ago you must be pretty blind.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2011-05-29, 08:27 PM
inb4 we refer to eos as "he-who-must-not-be-named"
but seriously, that filter is too darn big >.<
2011-05-29, 08:28 PM
ShinkuDragon Wrote:inb4 we refer to eos as "she-who-must-not-be-named" You did it wrong.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2011-05-29, 08:34 PM
BlueRuin Wrote:Jocularity, that is all. Jock humor is too blue for our new rules.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2011-05-29, 08:35 PM
Eosian Wrote:Jock humor is too blue for our new rules. Bahahahah, I see what you did there.
2011-05-29, 08:36 PM
[COLOR="green"]Personally I find this new filter for "fun[COLOR="green"]house" to be a little pointless, because as far as jokes go it's not very funny after the first time, especially because the filter is so huge. Why don't we just do the is<-> it filter, because that one's actually pretty good.
But nice joke man.[/COLOR][/COLOR]
2011-05-29, 08:39 PM
ShinkuDragon Wrote:inb4 we refer to eos as "he-who-must-not-be-named" Who the heck is eos?
2011-05-29, 08:44 PM
DualReaver Wrote:as far as jokes go it's not very funny after the first time, especially because the filter is so huge. [/COLOR] Because it's meant to be visible so it's hard to miss since as a joke it's not going to be around for long.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
2011-05-29, 08:46 PM
Eosian Wrote:Because it's meant to be visible so it's hard to miss since as a joke it's not going to be around for long. Okay, that's fine. I still want an it is filter though.
2011-05-30, 04:38 AM
Kunagisa Wrote:What did I miss? What word was Funhouse filtered to? This. I'm confused on the whole matter =| I think it was changed to what sarah said which is "Eastasia" or i might be wrong.
2011-05-30, 04:03 PM
Sarah Wrote:Looking for a ban on certain images outside of specific topics. The board already sucks ass Why do you have to suggest things that ruin it further more?
2011-05-30, 04:05 PM
Locked Wrote:The board already sucks ass How exactly would making it so it can no longer be FLOODED WITH PONIES make it suck more Pretty sure quality can only increase from that point.
2011-05-30, 04:15 PM
Sarah Wrote:How exactly would making it so it can no longer be FLOODED WITH PONIES make it suck more Because you can sure choose what you think is the right kind of spam in threads, spam is spam. And besides, these two threads over there atm have almost no topic at all anyway. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|