Jump update and SP resets?

Did the koreans get a free SP reset when the warrior and mage revamp hit the live server?
I know most skills just get changed into brand new ones instead of being reset and deleted. If that is the way it works level 200 players could have potential problems. I hope I am wrong here, or that the thief revamp will work differently.

Example of problem:

 Spoiler

For Night Lords, Ninja ambush is useless, and Taunt comes close to being that (with LHC and all). I'm sure most NLs at 200 end up with everything maxed except either taunt or ambush, with 18 points in the other. If they change ambush into something good, that would leave me with 18 points in it if they just convert it as it is. Shadow meso in 3rd job would be even worse since no sane assassin have any points in it at all.

Hope we get SP resets for that and Chaos

Don't worry.

For the first Jump update, (warriors) got free SP resets. Then on the second one (magicians), they got free SP resets as well.

Don't worry.

For the first Jump update, (warriors) got free SP resets. Then on the second one (magicians), they got free SP resets as well.

Thanks alot. =)

Don't think that's really a problem even if we didn't get the SP Reset. A lot of the skills were converted. Remember Achilles for DrKs? The points allocated in that were automatically transferred to Dark Impaler.

Don't think that's really a problem even if we didn't get the SP Reset. A lot of the skills were converted. Remember Achilles for DrKs? The points allocated in that were automatically transferred to Dark Impaler.

The skill before and after don't have necessarily the same priority in maxing.
For F/Ps fire demon becomes mist explosion. While one was almost useless and maxed very late, the latter is a very good skill you'd want to max early.

The skill before and after don't have necessarily the same priority in maxing.
For F/Ps fire demon becomes mist explosion. While one was almost useless and maxed very late, the latter is a very good skill you'd want to max early.

Yea, this. That's why I included an example in spoilers.