Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Southperry's own Thief Flaunting thread =D
Skylit Wrote:Thought you made a 21 att shield awhile back? o.o

And ew at +2 30 +5 60/70 kanzir! Tongue

David has my shield and I has David's shield.
I'll be more daring when we get more kanzirs in bello Cool
Reply
Lol, gg, I had 120m left today, bought a 43/5 Craven for 50m, 1 30% Claw for 27m, 3 60's, and 1 70.

Result:

30 - land
30 - land
70 - land
60 - land
60 - fail
60 - land
60 - fail

59 attack / 7 LUK Red Craven, purple-status! 1 attack higher than my 58/8 Scarab. =S LOL? I'll post a SS of the Craven whenever I stop being lazy and go on MS again! XD
Reply
You confuse me, Koi. You spent nearly a billion to scroll a Craven that's 1 attack higher than your Scarab, and it has like...a pumpernickelload more Dex requirement?

Why?
Reply
Opeth Wrote:You confuse me, Koi. You spent nearly a billion to scroll a Craven that's 1 attack higher than your Scarab, and it has like...a pumpernickelload more Dex requirement?

Why?

Actually, I already "was" over-DEX from the start. When I had that Blue Scarab, I had exactly 140 DEX total. >_> 30 DEX more than needed, so I decided to might as well get a Craven. =/

Of course, here's where I underestimated. I was hoping that I'd land either: a) 3 30's + 3 60s/70s OR b) 2 30's AND 5 60s/70s

But only 3 managed to land out of 5. >_> Had the other 2 landed, it would have actually been 63/7. >_> So that's your answer. I chanced it with 1 billion mesos, and in the end, I only got +1 more attack than before. But then again, for a NL, 1 single weapon attack is still a lot, so lol.. I can't say I'm too displeased either, because things could have went even worse, and had that 2nd 30 blew it up, I would have been buttpineappleed.
Reply
Opeth Wrote:You confuse me, Koi. You spent nearly a billion to scroll a Craven that's 1 attack higher than your Scarab, and it has like...a pumpernickelload more Dex requirement?

Why?

i think the better question would be "why did he scroll such a low base craven?". couldnt you at least wait till you see a 45, or 47? >_>

i mean, had you scrolled a 45, that wouldve been a 61atk claw right there. a good worth of a billion.
Reply
butterfli Wrote:i think the better question would be "why did he scroll such a low base craven?". couldnt you at least wait till you see a 45, or 47? >_>

45's in my server goes from ..... 70m+. >_>; 47's would be over 100m, I didn't have enough money to afford either. ok, I lied, I had enough money to afford the 45, but the ones I found in FM were:

a) Prescrolled (5X-ish)
b) all 43's. =/
Reply
Kasuhitomi Wrote:45's in my server goes from ..... 70m+. >_>; 47's would be over 100m, I didn't have enough money to afford either. ok, I lied, I had enough money to afford the 45, but the ones I found in FM were:

a) Prescrolled (5X-ish)
b) all 43's. =/

Don't listen to them T_T

If your happy with your claw, then be happy with it. Don't listen to them :O
Reply
Kasuhitomi Wrote:45's in my server goes from ..... 70m+. >_>; 47's would be over 100m, I didn't have enough money to afford either. ok, I lied, I had enough money to afford the 45, but the ones I found in FM were:

a) Prescrolled (5X-ish)
b) all 43's. =/

the key word i said was "wait". and also, if you waited, you would've been able to squeeze out another 50mil to buy a 47. but then by altering the past means you altering the future so the scrolls mightve landed differently if you waited... it might have even be +7!
Reply
I'm not hating on the fact he chose to do this. I was just confused, that's all.
Reply
butterfli Wrote:the key word i said was "wait". and also, if you waited, you would've been able to squeeze out another 50mil to buy a 47. but then by altering the past means you altering the future so the scrolls mightve landed differently if you waited... it might have even be +7!

Not necessarily. From my past scrolling experiences, when I try to buy something really expensive and try to land 3-4 30s, I always.. FAIL. But if I buy something below average, I tend to land 3-5 30's (this happened to my skirt and top <_<Wink, so theoretically speaking, it could have been worse. >_> I doubt it would have been better. I could have 30'ed it for the 3rd time too, but I didn't want to risk it. =/

PS: Yes, I am happy with my claw. XD But I'm still going to try to make a 65+ att one.
Reply
grats khoi ily<33
Reply
nice claw mr khoi. most people dont even have the balls to scroll their own shyt and with 30%'s being nearly 30m its quite eh x_X.
Reply
[Image: s3xykate184dr.jpg]
[Image: s3xykate184.jpg]

playing around at skelegons Smile
Reply
I bought myself a 65 attack Diamond Dagger in Yellonde for 4m.
Flaunt? :3
Reply
snaga Wrote:playing around at skelegons Smile

Everytime I see you post your damage, it's always been with apples/SE and hitting stars above 50k. Seeing a 17k is kinda... low now heh. I don't even know if that's good or really good since there are no basis to compare it to... except to compare to the 50k lol.
Reply
butterfli Wrote:Everytime I see you post your damage, it's always been with apples/SE and hitting stars above 50k. Seeing a 17k is kinda... low now heh. I don't even know if that's good or really good since there are no basis to compare it to... except to compare to the 50k lol.

Yeah, there aren't many 18x NL's that post here.. =/ She's one of the godliest NL's in gMS though. Cool

I'm posting my old Bandit's damage from like 7 months ago. Smile I'm kinda considering equiping my Bandit again (it's only lv 62). I'd have to get to 65 to equip a Fan.. Frown I don't have the time/patience to train. Someone pictofy please?
[Image: maple0053kg9.jpg]

Should I equip my Bandit again? I'm having a hard time deciding.. I'd probably have around 146 w.atk, DEXless. Anyone know a good spot where a lv 62 can leech a Bishop? :f6:
Reply
butterfli Wrote:Everytime I see you post your damage, it's always been with apples/SE and hitting stars above 50k. Seeing a 17k is kinda... low now heh. I don't even know if that's good or really good since there are no basis to compare it to... except to compare to the 50k lol.

thats mainly because what i personally feel is impressive, is large numbers produced via SE and apples / demon elixers. others have mentioned they prefer damage without so i figured id break up all these godly shadowers with a pic of a high level NL

i saw 30K's anego'ing with just an apple, and hit up to 45K @ HT.

on a side note i managed to solo pap (with demon elixer and SE) in 2 minutes and 40 seconds Tongue
need to find a level 200 to echo me, to see how low i can get it!
Reply
snaga Wrote:thats mainly because what i personally feel is impressive, is large numbers produced via SE and apples / demon elixers. others have mentioned they prefer damage without so i figured id break up all these godly shadowers with a pic of a high level NL

i saw 30K's anego'ing with just an apple, and hit up to 45K @ HT.

on a side note i managed to solo pap (with demon elixer and SE) in 2 minutes and 40 seconds Tongue
need to find a level 200 to echo me, to see how low i can get it!

You make me want to cry ;-;
Reply
snaga Wrote:thats mainly because what i personally feel is impressive, is large numbers produced via SE and apples / demon elixers. others have mentioned they prefer damage without so i figured id break up all these godly shadowers with a pic of a high level NL

i saw 30K's anego'ing with just an apple, and hit up to 45K @ HT.

on a side note i managed to solo pap (with demon elixer and SE) in 2 minutes and 40 seconds Tongue
need to find a level 200 to echo me, to see how low i can get it!

sorry to be off topic, i made a south perry account JUST to say hi to u scott. Hi scott its me gabz f3 lol i changed ign lol.
ps : i see u move servers...byee Sad

17.5k dmg on skele is good Wink
Reply
snaga Wrote:[Image: s3xykate184dr.jpg]
[Image: s3xykate184.jpg]

playing around at skelegons Smile


17k is sexy, Im barely doing 15k with chews @ 161 B>20 lvls @ a reasonble exp rate T.T
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)