2010-07-17, 01:48 AM
The first chicken hatched out of an egg. How does that computer know that that "special protein" wasn't present in that direct ancestor to the chicken?
|
Chicken or the Egg finally proved
|
|
2010-07-17, 01:48 AM
The first chicken hatched out of an egg. How does that computer know that that "special protein" wasn't present in that direct ancestor to the chicken?
2010-07-17, 02:30 AM
holyforest Wrote:Yep. The chicken came first apparently because the egg has a protein in it that is only produced inside the chicken. Without this special protein, the egg could not exist. Therefore, you have to have a chicken before you can have the egg. Do you have the original article?
2010-07-17, 03:11 AM
Moonlapse Wrote:Do you have the original article? This, otherwise you have no basis/source, so your argument is void.
2010-07-17, 03:43 AM
TøbiasBlack Wrote:There is no right answer to this question.The bold is incorrect. Many evolutionists have been known to state otherwise solely due to the fact that they believed the chicken was created through evolution and over time developed its ability to lay eggs. Some links: Wikipedia pomegranate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_or_the_egg I suppose this is the article, since this was mentioned in the Wikipedia pomegranate and because it was from 3 days ago: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/..._way_t.php Edit: Nope, I lied, that's a mockery of that article, saying how much of a fallacy it is. Ha. Real Link: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38238685/ns/...e-science/ Although apparently this claim is false, so take a gander at the scienceblogs one too.
2010-07-17, 04:17 AM
Truth is, I created this theory to throw you all off. Here is the true story.
Spoiler
2010-07-17, 09:21 AM
If chickens could only hatch out of the egg because of a protein present, then why could the chicken that laid that egg have hatched out of one? Or for that matter, why any other animal that was hatched from an egg before the chicken?
2010-07-17, 12:52 PM
ClawofBeta Wrote:The parent of the first chicken was not a chicken. I'm entirely sure that that is not how evolution works. You're not going to have direct Dinosaur Egg -> Chicken. It'd be a series of small mutations and variences in DNA with favorable traits for the time that created the chicken.
2010-07-17, 12:55 PM
Technicaly speaking neither came first and both came first.
Thinking that the chicken oviously has ancestors then that means that the change and the protein were produced gradualy, thus both came at the same time. Im a genius. edit: I've been ninja'd...sort of.
2010-07-17, 03:00 PM
So a dinosaur laid the egg that gave birth to the chicken due to some sort of mutation or whatever within the egg. So I guess this begs the question, where did the dinosaur come from?
Tobias was correct in a certain sense because this argument will always be in a never ending circle jerk. I support neither side because, really, it has zero impact on my life.
2010-07-21, 05:48 AM
Im computer and im saying the egg came first i got 666GB and 30000 mhz ram and 9000 GB of Gpu and 600 TB of HDD and 3001 year motherborad and intel with 1000 cores in speed of 100GB for sec
2010-07-21, 09:25 PM
Personally, I don't give a damn either way. Both are good for only one thing: Delicious breakfast.
OT: Whoa, this is kinda shocking. I still believe the egg came first. Gimmie an article to read and you have more credibility.
2010-07-24, 11:27 AM
Whenever I try to answer this, my brain explodes. Thank god for the instruction manual.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|