2008-07-30, 04:25 PM
Management Wrote:Personally, I disagree with putting people in prison for drugs, assault, and pretty much anything else. Good to know that they're off the streets, but our tax dollars go to building more prisons to prevent overcrowding.
The only solution I'd see fit is to make the current penalties for some crimes more harsh, such as a death/life sentence without parole for rapists, or repeat offenders.
If I could have it my way, there would be less tax dollars spent on enlarging and building new prisons if prisoners would just...die.
Life sentence without parole sounds like justice when the jury is listening to what he did -- perhaps murder 10 people or something.
What life sentence without parole in practice means is that the perp grows old being provided 3 squares a day, clothing, and shelter. As he becomes increasingly old, the state has a duty to provide him with free medical attention. As most people will tell you, medical attention is not cheap. Therefore, life sentence without parole in practical terms means that some 90 year old perp is being provided for, for the precise reason that he killed like 10 people. Many people who do not commit crimes have to go without medical attention, though I would say they deserve it more than the 90 year old perp.
That, and a 90 year old perp is no longer a violent offender. It is fairly rare for a 90 year old man to commit violent crime, even if he did a lot of it in his youth.
The long and short of it is that the firing squad or lethal injection is far more humane on society, if not for the perp.


