2009-11-15, 11:30 PM
![[Image: 42problem7.png]](http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/6332/42problem7.png)
Halp anyone? ;_;
|
The math help thread
|
|
2009-11-15, 11:42 PM
Mean Value Theorem states that there must exist some value c in [4, 8] for which f'© equals the mean value of f'(x) over [4, 8], i.e. the slope from 4 to 8, rise over run: f(8)-f(4) / 8-4.
So, for any value of c: -5 ≤ f'© ≤ 3 -5 ≤ f(8)-f(4) / 4 ≤ 3 -20 ≤ f(8)-f(4) ≤ 12
2009-11-15, 11:50 PM
RIGHT.
f'© = (f(b) - f(a)) / (b - a) SOOO... -5 < (f(8) - f(4)) / (8 - 4) < 3. Then just multiply both sides by the denominator. As long as I can do that question on the exam, I'm good. ![]() Thanks! ![]() EDIT: FFS the Webwork closed at 10:30. Every online section has ALWAYS closed at 11:30. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFf. xLeviathan Wrote:RIGHT. My bad, its more common name is indeed Mean Value Theorem. Darn 3rd world country's math.
2009-11-16, 05:15 PM
^ Lagrange error bound is something else, which has to do with approximating integrals using Simpson's Rule if I recall.
Couldn't you just make the 5 a base of 2? I dunno, but that's the first thing I thought of.
2^x=5 x log 2 = log 5 x = log5 / log2 2^(n^2) - 2^n = 2^(log5/log2) And since the bases are the same.. n^2 - n = log5/log2 and solve?
2009-11-16, 06:42 PM
I'm under the impression you can't take a log of two terms being added or subtracted and break them up.
Tried your way out on my calculator, and came up with n = 1 +- zi, where z is some number I didn't want to copy down. I know this has real solutions, via graphing.
2009-11-16, 06:46 PM
Yeah. I just graphed both of the equations and they came out different.. <_< Dunno why though. I thought I just substituted 5 with 2^(log5/log2) but I guess not.
2009-11-16, 06:49 PM
ln ( 5 + 7) != ln 5 + ln 7
:[ I remember my teaching talking about this with some imaginary trig (sin x = 2), using hyperbolic trig functions. Ended up with the same thing, I think, except with base e. Ended up doing a quadratic formula on it, although I can't remember the details....
2009-11-16, 07:06 PM
Putting in the two solutions from that into the equation, I get -2.144 and 14.87. Not really that close to 0. o.0
2009-11-16, 07:30 PM
Hazzy Wrote:Putting in the two solutions from that into the equation, I get -2.144 and 14.87. Not really that close to 0. o.0 Then you have probably misinterpreted. I get 2.10 and -1.10 as results. Keep in mind that ![]() which approximates to 10.29. Noah
2009-11-16, 07:44 PM
Graphed 2^(n^2)-2^n-5=0 and found the positive zero with the graphing calculator's zero thing. 1.75. o.0
Seems a bit off from 2.10. Are you sure you can take a log of each term on one side like that? ln(5+7)-(ln(5)+ln(7))=-1.07. That doesn't seem equal to me.
2009-11-16, 09:04 PM
Yeah, you can't do that.
Having said that I don't know what you can do, except factor out a 2^n on the left side which leaves you at a dead end as far as I know.
2009-11-16, 10:44 PM
let a=2^n
thus the equation a^2-a=5 solve a (do it urself i'm too lazy) then n= log a/ log 2
2009-11-16, 11:02 PM
Horusmaster Wrote:let a=2^nIt's 2^(n^2), not (2^n)^2. Unless it is (2^n)^2, in which case that does work.
2009-11-16, 11:03 PM
Hazzy Wrote:Graphed 2^(n^2)-2^n-5=0 and found the positive zero with the graphing calculator's zero thing. 1.75. o.0 This is correct, you cannot apply logarithms like I did. My, my, I seem to go old. Horusmaster Wrote:let a=2^nYou cannot do it that way. If a = 2^n, then 2^(n^2) = a^n. (By the way: Are you 100% sure it's 2^(n^2) and not (2^n)^2? ) [spoiler=Scrabbles, most won't likely help any] ![]() I'll see what I'll be able to do for tomorrow, as it's gettin late over here[/spoiler] Noah
Need some help on this one problem.
A winch at the top of a 12 meter building pulls a pipe of the same length to a vertical position, as shown in figure 29. The winch pulls in rope at a rate of -0.2 meters per second. Find the rate of vertical change and the rate of horizontal change at the end of the pipe when y = 6. Here's a picture http://i33.tinypic.com/n2xut2.jpg I got root21/30 for dy/dt and -root7/30 for dx/dt. Is this correct? I didn't feel like using law of cosines, so I dropped two perpendiculars, one to the building and one to the floor. I got that for when y = 6, s = root84 and x is root108. Can anyone confirm for me? I found some answers online that say dy/dt is 1/5 and dx/dt -root3 / 15 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|