Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The next time...
#21
RDal Wrote:Perhaps now we'll finally see an end to anime girls being posted everywhere.

I smiled.
Reply
#22
Who the fck uses ImageShack? It uploads terribly slow. I mean, it's a nice substitution for Photobucket and sht at times, but I wouldn't even use IMGSHACK to upload any pictures. -shudders-
Reply
#23
(glad that wasnt me... phew)
ive not once heard of nor had issues with imageshack. o-0
Reply
#24
IllegallySane Wrote:Why Imageshack have so much hate? ;_;

*I never knew pic hosting sites can actually ban an entire site like SP.
I actually didn't know either.

Khoi Wrote:Who the fck uses ImageShack? It uploads terribly slow. I mean, it's a nice substitution for Photobucket and sht at times, but I wouldn't even use IMGSHACK to upload any pictures. -shudders-
Have a photobucket account that I'm too lazy to log into. Was too lazy to even look for a new site to upload, since Imageshack and Photobucket were like the top known image hosting sites years ago and I just grew on those two. I've never known they'd be so nazi over their crap (in the past, photobucket deleted crap for me that wasn't even explicit in any way). Also, most other image upload services I've bumped into (at the time) only provided 1 image upload at a time. Which ended up being slower than imageshack, despite the faster upload speeds.

Bacon Wrote:Imageshack is a horrible place to upload your images.

IMGUR is the way to go.

Gah, I just uploaded 6 files on this just to find a BAD GATEWAY error. Hitting back on my browser didn't save those files. I have to search my folders for those images again. Stunned
Reply
#25
TehMatt Wrote:http://www.southperry.net/forums/showthread.php?t=19382

Read that

Yeah, ive seen that pic in a few place, and it isnt really that pornographic or sexual in nature. So you get a panny shot, ive seen worse than that alice pic Goggleemoticon
Reply
#26
Sn1perJohnE Wrote:Yeah, ive seen that pic in a few place, and it isnt really that pornographic or sexual in nature. So you get a panny shot, ive seen worse than that alice pic Goggleemoticon
Yeah that's nice but you don't get to decide what's "sexual content" by imageshack's definitions. Clearly their definition is a hell of a lot more restrictive than yours.
Reply
#27
Yes yes, I suppose theyd even think something suggestive of inappropriate content would cause them to go ape pomegranate. Oh, the times we live in.
Reply
#28
Wait, what was this pic about?
Or if anyone has it, pm it to me if it's hard to describe. I'm curious now.
Reply
#29
shouri Wrote:Wait, what was this pic about?
Or if anyone has it, pm it to me if it's hard to describe. I'm curious now.

Anime porn or close-to-porn, most likely. Funhouse needs much less of that.

Anyway, imageshack sucks. Just tinypic it.
Reply
#30
Fiel Wrote:anyone posts anything that gets us banned from Imageshack again gets a one way ticket to permanent ban, IP ban, and ban-on-sight. This is inexcusable.

What is ban on sight?
Reply
#31
Exactly what it sounds like. If we ever see you (being the person you) we ban that account.

Permanent Ban = The account currently being used is set to "banned users"
IP Ban = User is banned via the server's firewall
Ban-on-sight = User is banned whenever he is detected on a mult, proxy, or otherwise
Reply
#32
Fiel Wrote:Exactly what it sounds like. If we ever see you (being the person you) we ban that account.

Permanent Ban = The account currently being used is set to "banned users"
IP Ban = User is banned via the server's firewall
Ban-on-sight = User is banned whenever he is detected on a mult, proxy, or otherwise

Can ImageShack really charge SouthPerry because one of their members uploaded a sexual-content photo to ImageShack, and then having that link on here? I can see why they'd be enraged, but that's a bit too far, don't you think?
Reply
#33
Fiel Wrote:Exactly what it sounds like. If we ever see you (being the person you) we ban that account.

Permanent Ban = The account currently being used is set to "banned users"
IP Ban = User is banned via the server's firewall
Ban-on-sight = User is banned whenever he is detected on a mult, proxy, or otherwise
Isn't it like that with EVERY banned account?
Reply
#34
Kortestanov Wrote:Isn't it like that with EVERY banned account?
well, if someone who was banned in the past were to start a new count and doesn't act up, there's really no reason to suspect they're a previous troublemaker, nor can we realistically check every single new account to see if it's a mult. So, unless there's some reason to suspect them no one would know. On top of that there are people who have been perma-banned in the past who came back a few months later and said "You know, I'm sorry, I was in the wrong before and I apologize for my behavior. It will not happen again." If they are mature enough to realize this then we'll usually give them a second chance.

Anyone who gets on the "Ban-on-sight" list is going to be banned as soon as they're detected. A person whose account was banned could still view the forums as a guest, but if they're IP banned then they can't even visit the site. So it's more like:
1. Banned account - lose posting privileges
2. IP Ban - lose site viewing privileges
3. Ban on sight - Beyond any attempt at redemption.
Reply
#35
IsaacGS Wrote:3. Ban on sight - Beyond any attempt at redemption without help from vouchers.

Fixed. Granted, it mind as well be jebus saying "you're fked for the rest of your life".

I'm not sure if anything I've ever uploaded to Imageshack has anything to do with breaching the rules o.O I don't store all that stuff you anime fanboys or prawn gawkers have anyways, let alone hoard them in some collection.
Reply
#36
KajitiSouls Wrote:Fixed. Granted, it mind as well be jebus saying "you're fked for the rest of your life".

I'm not sure if anything I've ever uploaded to Imageshack has anything to do with breaching the rules o.O I don't store all that stuff you anime fanboys or prawn gawkers have anyways, let alone hoard them in some collection.
If Jesus came to me in person and said "you can unban ********, he's a great dude really" I would say "Hey Jesus, I'm not sure you're familiar with ********, cause he's a total plantain and i don't want him around. BTW when's that armageddon coming?"

The B.o.S list is extremely short though. like, 2 or 3 people short.
Reply
#37
IsaacGS Wrote:If Jesus came to me in person and said "you can unban ********, he's a great dude really" I would say "Hey Jesus, I'm not sure you're familiar with ********, cause he's a total plantain and i don't want him around. BTW when's that armageddon coming?"
.

My dearest Isaac,

"Thou shall not make wrongful use of the name of your God." But fear not my son, for the Lord always forgives.

You can unban Greg, he's a great dude really.

[fright]Your Savior,
Jesus[/fright]

PS: See you December 21, 2012!
Reply
#38
While I thought someone might make an alt when he said that, I am also a little surprised it wasn't taken until now since "god" is.
Reply
#39
Jesus Wrote:PS: See you December 12, 2012!

[COLOR="Red"]Fix'd. Oh yes, I did just correct Jesus. Rolleyes

Awn Tawpic: I wasn't aware they could ban an entire site. Someone needs to fix the Funhouse's fetish with anime girls, fastly.
[/COLOR]
Reply
#40
Blaine Wrote:Fix'd. Oh yes, I did just correct Jesus. Rolleyes

Awn Tawpic: I wasn't aware they could ban an entire site. Someone needs to fix the Funhouse's fetish with anime girls, fastly.

actually...
you were wrong, it is 12/21/2012.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)