...this is why i love /d/

"is it considered rape to have sex with a person in a total coma?"

and its a serious discussion. going on, now. theyre discussing the legality to such an act, going through scenarios and hypotheticals about the logistics to this, and whether it would count as necrophilia (vegetative state level of coma), or whether a lawyer was brought in and had that drafted into a living will.

only on /d/ will one find images so grotesque that even marilyn manson would be disturbed, yet have the people therein capable of pseudo-politician level discussions.

wats /d/?

 Spoiler

just kidding. allow me to personally welcome you to the internet where everyone is ing insane

wats /d/?

 Spoiler

just kidding. allow me to personally welcome you to the internet where everyone is ing insane

i already antiquated myself quite nicely with the internet when i immersed myself into it at the age of 17...
kinda.

I believe we've had our own fair share of equally ridiculous threads.

[COLOR="Green"]That is one hell of a nice conversation.

Try adding in STDs to that conversation. See where they go with it.[/COLOR]

wats /d/?

 Spoiler

just kidding. allow me to personally welcome you to the internet where everyone is ing insane

[color="#cc8899"]
Not insane, crazy. There's a difference.[/COLOR]

I assume that theoretically you believe you are one of the two. And that everyone else is in the second category that you have not conveniently placed yourself into.

can some one give me a link to said topic, this is very relevant to my interests.

can some one give me a link to said topic, this is very relevant to my interests.

(url removed)

go for it

BullDog-edit: No posting those links without a VERY clear warning!

I assume that theoretically you believe you are one of the two. And that everyone else is in the second category that you have not conveniently placed yourself into.

[color="#cc8899"]
Not necessarily. I recognize quite a few people in either category, some in both, some in neither. Crazy lends itself to to more random and thoughtless acts, while insanity is more of "different" thought process. That is, that insanity still has an underlying rationale to behaviors, just one that is fundamentally different from that of sane people. Crazy does not appear to have one, or is one so entirely different that it cannot be truly understood.

For instance, someone who kills elderly citizens because he believes he is doing them a favor by cutting their life short before it deteriorates further is insane. Someone who kills because they realize that can would be more likely to be crazy.

By no means are these definitions the textbook or "real" definitions, but rather ones that make the most sense to me. I tend to think I have a touch of insanity, sometimes a little crazy, but no more than anyone else on the planet.[/COLOR]

http://orz.4chan.org/d/res/1925147.html

go for it

We should play, spot the ones from Southperry.

We should play, spot the ones from Southperry.

We should play, spot the ones from Southperry.

The OP is opeth and the dude who said "/d/ - we know s'hit about rape laws" is throws.

[color="#cc8899"]
Not necessarily. I recognize quite a few people in either category, some in both, some in neither. Crazy lends itself to to more random and thoughtless acts, while insanity is more of "different" thought process. That is, that insanity still has an underlying rationale to behaviors, just one that is fundamentally different from that of sane people. Crazy does not appear to have one, or is one so entirely different that it cannot be truly understood.

For instance, someone who kills elderly citizens because he believes he is doing them a favor by cutting their life short before it deteriorates further is insane. Someone who kills because they realize that can would be more likely to be crazy.

By no means are these definitions the textbook or "real" definitions, but rather ones that make the most sense to me. I tend to think I have a touch of insanity, sometimes a little crazy, but no more than anyone else on the planet.[/COLOR]

Thanks for responding. The one key note I picked up from your explanation is the fact that your definitions of insane and crazy seem to just center on the idea of rationality. Insane people attempt to rationalize their actions while crazy people don't even bother.

However, normal people do this as well. They love to rationalize their failures, be apathetic about their losses, and move on with their lives. The only difference is perhaps the fact that the actual actions that insane/crazy people commit are considered to be socially taboo in the laws that govern whatever majority rules the territory.

The irony is that insanity/craziness is used to describe a mental condition. However, the main judgment of that mental condition is not the mental condition in and of itself, but the product of the mental condition which is an undesirable product in the eyes of the normal (majority) population. The irony is that a person could be insane/crazy all their life. But as long as they keep on producing desirable products in accordance to the majority of society, they will never be exposed and might even be heralded as King of the Normal People.

I tend to find such "product-related" diagnosis similar to industrial capitalism. And the fact that the mentally insane aren't judged on the basis of being mentally insane/crazy. They're judged on not being efficient members in human society. And because they can't create useful products, they are given such a label.

The OP is opeth and the dude who said "/d/ - we know s'hit about rape laws" is throws.

Opeth likes the feet so he would go to /h/, however Throws seems like a /d/udette.

Thanks for responding. The one key note I picked up from your explanation is the fact that your definitions of insane and crazy seem to just center on the idea of rationality. Insane people attempt to rationalize their actions while crazy people don't even bother.

However, normal people do this as well. They love to rationalize their failures, be apathetic about their losses, and move on with their lives. The only difference is perhaps the fact that the actual actions that insane/crazy people commit are considered to be socially taboo in the laws that govern whatever majority rules the territory.

The irony is that insanity/craziness is used to describe a mental condition. However, the main judgment of that mental condition is not the mental condition in and of itself, but the product of the mental condition which is an undesirable product in the eyes of the normal (majority) population. The irony is that a person could be insane/crazy all their life. But as long as they keep on producing desirable products in accordance to the majority of society, they will never be exposed and might even be heralded as King of the Normal People.

I tend to find such "product-related" diagnosis similar to industrial capitalism. And the fact that the mentally insane aren't judged on the basis of being mentally insane/crazy. They're judged on not being efficient members in human society. And because they can't create useful products, they are given such a label.

[color="#cc8899"]To be honest, I could care less if someone is sane/insane/crazy/demented. I personally hold the belief that "sanity" is only defined as adherence to social norms, which most people deviate from at least at some point or on some principle anyway. As for rationalizing, yes, "normal" people do this as well, but the fact that their behavior falls within social norms demonstrates that they are still sane, even if their behavior isn't desirable. Undesirable behavior is not necessarily insane, nor is insane behavior necessarily undesirable. For example, many people are beloved for their decidedly silly and non-serious behavior, despite most of society, especially the workforce, being very rigid and serious.

To note,
Insanity =/= bad or undesirable, but can be related. Same applies to crazy, etc. While insane people tend to exhibit similar base behaviors to sane people (rationalizing, being logical), the logic is skewed in an abnormal way, whereas "sane" people do make mistakes and justify them, but in a "normal" way - one that is understandable and can be related to by most of the other normal people.[/COLOR]

can i has be the tentacle monster?

can i has be the tentacle monster?

Only if I can be the cowboyUH!

OP is underageb&.

OP is 20 year old virginfag with too much time on his hands...
in his hands...