New BBCode - imgspoiler

"imgspoiler" is a convenience BBCode that combines the best features of images and spoilers, and it also makes pure image topics a lot easier to wade through.

USAGE:

[imgspoiler]http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/1399/maple0088z.jpg[/imgspoiler]

[imgspoiler="This is why I'm hot"]http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/1399/maple0088z.jpg[/imgspoiler]

I don't exactly.. get it, what is the difference between normal ones and imgspoilers?

Look at the BBCode.

So it is exactly the same except for the code?

Yup. Like I said, it's a convenience function.

Oh thats how you do it, thanks Fiel

[COLOR="Red"]For those of whom are too lazy to quote Fiel to see what he's talking about, it's like this:

Code:

Taking [spoiler] and [img] and putting them into one thing.

So instead of going...
[spoiler][img]http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/1399/maple0088z.jpg[img][spoiler]
You go
[spoilerimg]http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/1399/maple0088z.jpg[spoilerimg]

This leads me to wondering if you can put other text in there Mr. Fiel.[/COLOR]

if i may test?
[imgspoiler]http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/photosizer/upload/thriller011409.jpg[/imgspoiler]

You tube test? EDIT: fail'd
[imgspoiler]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urNyg1ftMIU[/imgspoiler]
you tube embed test? EDIT: fail'd
[imgspoiler]<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/urNyg1ftMIU&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/urNyg1ftMIU&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>[/imgspoiler]
image within a image...
[imgspoiler] http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/photosi...011409.jpg [imgspoiler] http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/photosi...011409.jpg [/imgspoiler] [/imgspoiler]

Testing.....

 Spoiler

wut

Ew spoilerimg failed on me. =(

Thanks! A lot more convinient; though looks like we'll still need the old way to put more than one photo in the same spoiler as others.

Well, testing using a picture I already worked with in another thread just for the heck of it:
[imgspoiler]http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa143/SirPablo_The_III/NewAdvertisementUI.jpg[/imgspoiler]

EDIT: SUCCESS!

Testing.....

 Spoiler

wut

Ew spoilerimg failed on me. =(

It's imgspoiler, not spoilerimg.

Personally I don't see what the big difference is between [noparse]

 Spoiler

[img][/img]

and [imgspoiler][/imgspoiler][/noparse]

One is a lot easier to use.

Tinypic > choose the "forum" link > paste > type

 Spoiler

twice (or click the spoiler toolbutton, if using advanced reply / quote)
vs
Tinypic > choose the raw link > paste > type [imgspoiler] twice.

Not a huge difference, though I realize there's no point debating this. Having it won't hurt; one can still do it the old fashioned way. I know I won't ever remember this exists.

Tinypic > choose the "forum" link > paste > type

 Spoiler

twice (or click the spoiler toolbutton, if using advanced reply / quote)
vs
Tinypic > choose the raw link > paste > type [imgspoiler] twice.

Not a huge difference, though I realize there's no point debating this. Having it won't hurt; one can still do it the old fashioned way. I know I won't ever remember this exists.

Learning new things is a chore too.