2009-08-21, 04:56 PM
TheTyphoon Wrote:what about a +7 gm scrolled 1h-sword? o.9
We'll have to wait for Eos to post some more code for them to copy and paste into the game before they fix that.
|
Roll Back on HT pendents
|
|
2009-08-21, 04:56 PM
TheTyphoon Wrote:what about a +7 gm scrolled 1h-sword? o.9 We'll have to wait for Eos to post some more code for them to copy and paste into the game before they fix that.
2009-08-21, 04:59 PM
TobiasBlack Wrote:the glitch with hammers and server changes should be addressed also in this patch, but they might not be. =/ it already is being addressed. thats why nobody can world xfer right now
2009-08-21, 05:05 PM
I am actually surprised at the level Nexon went for this. I guess this must be what they're going to tell Santa about to get their presents at Christmas. I can understand rolling back such a blatant flaw on Nexon's part, though I hope they actually take the time to do a thorough examination so ALL pendants get fixed. I also hope that anyone who lost money because of this gets some REALLY decent compensation.
On a side note, I find the people who took advantage of the glitch and began farming them to make millions of mesos to be the ultimate bad guy here. Those who bought one due to the stat increases and did not ultimately think of the consequences in the end have no fault at all. I would find someone at fault if they had bought a +6 Cape with 0 Hammers used, but on an item that is obviously a glaring flaw to most, but is possible based on usual game standards, ie. no hacking required, could be acceptable to forgive them for taking advantage of it. That being said... FFS NEXON. Program your games, guys. If you only intend for something to be scrolled once, only LET it be scrolled once. And also test out things to see if there are issues with your programming before going "Come look at this new candy Nexon made for you!"
2009-08-21, 05:07 PM
HackrElk Wrote:so tell me, what else should i wait on nexon's say on? maybe my ele wand is too good (they'll probably take that too). you're saying that when an opportunity comes out, me as a mapler who plays the game to help others and get stronger should wait for an ok on it? [ lv. 120 You're just trying to over exaggerate things here. This only pertains to glitches. You wouldn't think "it might not be right!" for an average weapon that comes out, like timeless gear. But if, for example, a weapon comes out that gives a stackable buff of +10 int every time a hit lands, and instead it gives the buff every time a skill works, one would KNOW that it's not working like intended. However, people like to go into this little self-justification and think that just because someone hasn't said it's illegal yet, that they can get away with it. In the above example, someone would just spam their easiest and fastest buff over and over with the weapon to get multiple buffs, and then play the innocent routine when it's declared wrong. Not saying you're guilty of anything, but everyone here who knew this basic concept played it safe and waited it out, like IllegallySane said. Heck, I waited forever since elemental wands came out, even getting a 95 m.atk kebob and 85/1 clean wisdom, until Nexon stated officially what they were to be used for.
Off-topic
2009-08-21, 05:22 PM
TheTyphoon Wrote:im guessing his harsh tone It is the internet. I too saw it. But that's what I meant by the same tune. By the way, it just came to mind, but I too remember hearing about JMS releasing it's own way of getting a 2nd egg onto your htpend.
2009-08-21, 05:28 PM
TheTyphoon Wrote:what about a +7 gm scrolled 1h-sword? o.9 [COLOR="Red"]That's a much larger volume of money being talked about there, and I don't think there's any way to check whether a 1-handed sword had a 10, 30, or 100% GM scroll worked on it, since they all give the same effects. ![]() But that...is butthurt for a whole other thread. [/COLOR]
2009-08-21, 06:12 PM
Sn1perJohnE Wrote:Watch, in like 4 patches, they are gonna release the "legit" way to 3 egg your ht pendants I can see it already: New in cash shop, a special scroll for a 30% chance to upgrade your horntail pendant. Only 25k NX.
2009-08-21, 06:13 PM
MasPan Wrote:Salleem tried to offload his in Bellocan. I smega'd immediately afterwards about the reset. Much hilarity ensued. I tried this on bera. I was slightly dissapointed when all I got was much thanks for letting people know, and no angered response from people trying to sell them
2009-08-21, 06:16 PM
Hehehehe, now this lukless bishop who has an over-inflated ego and bugs me all the time can't make a reverse enreal tear anymore to taunt me.
2009-08-21, 06:18 PM
Nice to see Nexon doing something about this. I sent a ticket about this, and they closed it earlier today without a response. I guess this forum notice is why they did that.
![]() Only thing I hate is that the players who abused this glitch are actually getting compensated. They don't deserve it at all in my opinion. And go cry some more about the 8,5k nx of the 2 hammers. Many of the players who were wrongfully banned for the illegal meso thing didn't get refunded for their 14 day store (which is 9,9k nx) or other nx items, and that wasn't even their fault. If you abused this glitch, it's your own fault, and you should not get compensated. >_> Well at least we won't be seeing 52 stat pendants anymore, this makes me happy again, especially since I'm in Scania with that one guild.
2009-08-21, 06:24 PM
im not trying to start anything, but i think everyone in scania is just biased towards the HTP's that were scrolled because of Excellent or w/e the guild is that holds HT cave. but most scanian people who have been claiming its a glitch and laugh at everyone that is getting it taken away, all mention that guild in their posts. they all want to see that guild get hit hard and see them waste their money
if im wrong, then im wrong w/e
2009-08-21, 06:40 PM
TheTyphoon Wrote:im not trying to start anything, but i think everyone in scania is just biased towards the HTP's that were scrolled because of Excellent or w/e the guild is that holds HT cave. but most scanian people who have been claiming its a glitch and laugh at everyone that is getting it taken away, all mention that guild in their posts. they all want to see that guild get hit hard and see them waste their money You're correct. I'm in khaini and i want excellent to burn...that's when you know they're f'ucked up. holyforest Wrote:Hehehehe, now this lukless bishop who has an over-inflated ego and bugs me all the time can't make a reverse enreal tear anymore to taunt me. He isn't luckless then. O_O He's low luck.
2009-08-21, 06:57 PM
Wait, if they're rolling back HT pends, does this affect everyone's current rankings too, as well as their items such as: 17+ att SCG, etc?
Or does this ONLY affect HT pendants that were glitched, meaning the ones that has overly high stats = nullified and gets resetted, while the person that glitched gets NX+MaplePoints+NXclothes only? I'm just wondering HOW they're rolling back.
2009-08-21, 07:00 PM
TobiasBlack Wrote:the thing is, according to isaac, the HTP was never meant to be egged more than once (which is utter crap). the glitch with hammers and server changes should be addressed also in this patch, but they might not be. =/ I'm not saying for them to stop it from working; they've already done that. Server transfers didnt go through last SC and their Server Check notes at the bottom said they're fixing it. What I meant was that if they're rolling back these HTPs, they might, JUST MIGHT rollback those crazy +11/+13 BWGs. As for the GM scrolled lunchboxes, that <could> be addressed too, but you never know. All Im saying is that now that they fix one thing, you dont know what else they could POSSIBLY fix as well.
2009-08-21, 07:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 2009-08-21, 07:07 PM by Firehuntah.)
Kasuhitomi Wrote:Wait, if they're rolling back HT pends, does this affect everyone's current rankings too, as well as their items such as: 17+ att SCG, etc? They can alter stats on all glitched HT pendants at once with a sql query on their database as eos already showed in some other thread. Thing is, if they do this, it might not have the original stats if the original one had some 23's or better avoid or w/e. We'll see in a few days how it'll go though. :p TheTyphoon Wrote:im not trying to start anything, but i think everyone in scania is just biased towards the HTP's that were scrolled because of Excellent or w/e the guild is that holds HT cave. but most scanian people who have been claiming its a glitch and laugh at everyone that is getting it taken away, all mention that guild in their posts. they all want to see that guild get hit hard and see them waste their money True, I like seeing them suffer from this for once. They really 'ed up Scania badly with all the things they have done in the past. Doesn't mean I'm only against them for abusing this glitch though, I'm against everyone who has abused this, in any server. But well.. they've made billions of mesos, and are even getting compensation for abusing it. This sucks as well.
2009-08-21, 07:04 PM
Retalion Wrote:As for the GM scrolled lunchboxes, that <could> be addressed too, but you never know. All Im saying is that now that they fix one thing, you dont know what else they could POSSIBLY fix as well. I seriously doubt that. Some of the perfect ones, while they had 1 or a few GM scrolls, had slots that were 10%ed legitly. Also as been said before they don't have the ability to tell whether it was a 10% or a GM scroll since they give the same stats and stuff.
2009-08-21, 07:25 PM
pineapple yeah. I knew it!
Finally, a time where I can just sit, grinning, and shout back the appropriate phrase at this point, "I told you so!"
2009-08-21, 07:36 PM
*Waiting for Nexon to nerf my lunchbox to finally quit this game.*
If you think about it for 1 minute it wouldn't be a surprise if they actually "fix" the godly 1 handed swords. After all it wouldn't hit a large group of people so they wouldn't care about money loses.
2009-08-21, 07:57 PM
Well, I'll be damned. Something ACTUALLY went right! And no one got banned in the process! What the fu-
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|