the msn thread

Now now, that wasn't needed. I was thinking of throwing my MSN in this thread, but the above post reminded me that I'd rather not contaminate my list of cool cats with bullies and meanies... :o(

do it f'ag

I don't think so, Tim.

shadowhoamg@hotmail.com

:]

damnit, need to register the name kortestanov@gmail.com. brb

EDIT: since when do you need to verify your gmail account using SMS...?

lgf_darkman@hotmail.com

lolname.

Why should I trust you guys with my msn? I want 5 paragraph essays here, people.

5 paragraph essay coming right up.

It will undoubtedly surprise some people to hear me say this, but when I first realized that I am horrified by xBTAx's devotion to the idea of a benevolent dictatorship of a self-appointed elite, a cold shudder ran down my back. Let me cut to the chase: XBTAx might have been in a lethargic state of autointoxication when he said that his faith in autism gives him an uncanny ability to detect astral energy and cosmic vibrations. More likely, perhaps, is that xBTAx has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then spiteful, disingenuous flimflammers will be free to muzzle xBTAx's critics. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how I once overheard xBTAx say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? XBTAx said that women are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that if he were paying attention—which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this—he'd see that if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would undeniably say that if we don't embark on a new path towards change right now, then xBTAx's effusions will soon start to metastasize until they take the focus off the real issues.

In xBTAx's cringers' rush to join the crowd, they failed to observe that if we let xBTAx control what we do and how we do it, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization. How I pity him if I were to be his judge. I would start by notifying the jury that one of xBTAx's lickspittles once said, "I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that xBTAx's blanket statements are Holy Writ." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that xBTAx wants you to believe that simple-minded troglodytes aren't ever dotty. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by xBTAx's socially inept tricks.

XBTAx's cat's-paws resist seeing that the xBTAx-induced era of sham and deceit and pretense will draw to a close eventually. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to make plans and carry them out. XBTAx, please spare us the angst of living in a fallen world. If he opened his eyes, he'd realize that he is basically a bad person. He constantly insists that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. But he contradicts himself when he says that his decisions are based on reason. I am sorry to have to put this so bluntly, but I intend to look closely at xBTAx's equivocations to see what makes them so effectual at challenging all I stand for. I should expect to find—this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify—that xBTAx contends that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. What planet is he from? The planet Abysmal? If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that as long as I live and breathe, I will strive to shield people from xBTAx's corrupt and chthonic deceptions, so to speak.

At the very least, xBTAx's vituperations may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into boisterous, mad statism. The most sobering aspect of xBTAx's philippics is that xBTAx does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that the world is crying out to labor beneath his firm but benevolent heel, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.

The facts are, succinctly, these: First, xBTAx has nephelococcygic delusions about being able to turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top. Second, xBTAx has been known to "prove" statistically that exclusivism and neocolonialism are identical concepts. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, xBTAx's "proof" demonstrates only that he believes that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by xBTAx and his dim-witted adherents. And that, in my view, is our real problem.

Wat.

text

Indeed. Answered below.

There are a number of things I could have chosen to write about in this letter. I could have chosen to write about how Quantact's communiqués have put our proud nation on a path which, if left unchanged, may well cause it to follow the Roman Empire into historical oblivion. Or I might have chosen to write something about the way that he doesn't understand politics or simply doesn't care. But, instead, I've decided to devote this entire letter to explaining how Quantact's accomplices must be worn out from the acrobatics they have to perform to keep Quantact from turning on them, too. First things first: Quantact is eminently poxy. For proof of this fact I must point out that society must soon decide either to clean up the country and get it back on course again or else to let Quantact treat traditional values as if they were drossy, unpatriotic crimes. The decision is one of life or death, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever. I can hope only that those in charge realize that Quantact is squarely in favor of prætorianism and its propensity to replace our timeless traditions with his uppity ones. This is so typical of Quantact: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally.

Just because Quantact and his patsies don't like being labelled as "benighted malcontents" or "dour drongos" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. However, we are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which power-drunk stool pigeons like Quantact are utterly absent. The other road leads into the darkness of alarmism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? You see, whenever anyone states the obvious—that Quantact loves masochism with the kind of irrational passion normally reserved for professional sports teams—discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Is Quantact just trying to misdirect our efforts into fighting each other rather than into understanding the nature and endurance of disloyal, uneducated exclusionism?" All I can do now is give you a bare-bones answer and then let you dig into it yourself. To understand the basic answer you need to realize that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Quantact may come to represent the most insidious corruption of ideals yet. I was right when I said that Quantact's mentality reminds me of the stereotypical bureaucrat who cannot function unless he can "find it in the manual". And I was right when I said that if everyone does his own, small part, together we can introduce an important but underrepresented angle on Quantact's pharisaical refrains.

If Quantact's thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, he wouldn't consider it such a good idea to lead us into an age of shoddiness—shoddy goods, shoddy services, shoddy morals, and shoddy people. Wherever you look, you'll see Quantact enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity.

Purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of Quantact's ill-bred equivocations. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how I have one itsy-bitsy problem with Quantact's belief systems. Videlicet, they use every conceivable form of diplomacy, deception, pressure, coercion, bribery, treason, and terror to feed us ever-larger doses of his lies and crackpot assumptions. And that's saying nothing about how I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival.

Quantact has a knack for convincing addlepated jackanapes that he answers to no one. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "counterrevolutionist" and "pseudoconglomeration" to keep his sales pitch from sounding stuck-up. That's why you really have to look hard to see that Quantact is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, he frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to concoct labels for people, objects, and behaviors in order to manipulate the public's opinion of them. Now that you've read my entire letter, I hope you've concluded that my plan to suggest the kind of politics and policies that are needed to restore good sense to this important debate is deserving of serious consideration.

Aight lets drop it. de-raaaaaaaaaaaail.

I was just poking fun at the "5 paragraph" thing.

I was just poking fun at the "5 paragraph" thing.

I know lol

I am really at a loss for what to say in this letter other than to convey my shock.

I am too. How can you make such a wall of text?

xBTAx is right about one thing, namely that fear is what motivates us. Fear of what it means when the worst classes of logorrheic humanity-haters there are block streets and traffic to the extent that ambulances can't get through. Fear of what it says about our society when we teach our children that two wrongs make a right. And fear of dotty lethargic-types like xBTAx who advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills.

Eh? xBTAx doesn't operate through fear. It operates through indifference. Indifference may strike fear, but xBTAx isn't directly causing fear or it will cause bad business for them.

xBTAx maintains that either its policies epitomize wholesome family entertainment or that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. xBTAx denies any other possibility.

wtp? xBTAx has said nothing of the sort.

I feel no shame in writing that if we are to lend a helping hand, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the ophidian and militant ideologies that xBTAx promotes.

xBTAx does not promote any practices. It operates on, but does not promote.

We all learned the Golden Rule in school. Maybe xBTAx was absent that day.

xBTAx does not need to operate on Golden Rule because it KNOWs that it can sustain such business with the loss of a few people.[/quote]

Mutual efforts against meddlesome vigilantism are not just an educational process designed to teach people that a plan of rational reaction to xBTAx's noxious outbursts is surely in order. These efforts also serve as a beacon, warning the world of the subhuman consequences of xBTAx's obstreperous witticisms.

I think the world would better understand it better if you didn't type like this all the time. Injecting vocabulary every word is just making it difficult to read, especially if your prose is 5 blocks long.

I have no set opinion as to whether or not xBTAx is the type of organization that would shoot you just to see if its gun worked. I do, however, clearly contend that if it were up to it, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism.

xBTAx may be racist, but they need to promote their other servers as well, they can only but ban everyone who lives in a zone designated for those servers.

It should come as no big shock to anyone that no one has a higher opinion of xBTAx than I, and I think xBTAx's a pigheaded freak of nature.

Your assumption is false. I don't have a high view of xBTAx, but I certainly have a higher view of them than you do.

As a parenthetical note, I think this is tragic. In reaching that conclusion I have made the usual assumption that I must ask that its companions recognize and respect the opinions, practices, and behavior of others. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to weaken family ties.

I don't see how in any way xBTAx would weaken your family ties.

There are two flaws with xBTAx's mottos: 1) I unequivocally do not intend this letter to be in any way misinterpreted as a personal attack on xBTAx, and 2) ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic.

Your post is indeed a personal attack on xBTAx, as you do not represent anyone anywhere else, it is purely a solo attempt at defaming xBTAx. And I don't know why you would talk about Ancient Greeks and their tragedies, as I have yet to see xBTAx finding virtue in tragedy.

xBTAx would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being detestable. If we provide a trenchant analysis of xBTAx's notions then the sea of classism, on which xBTAx so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. Even as I write those words I can feel xBTAx cringe. That's okay. Cringe.

Why would xBTAx cringe at someone posting somewhere where almost nobody (as compared to the population who play maple) will see, in a rant form. Also, those who do read it must scrutinize this prose so much that nobody will bother caring even if they do see it.

I don't care because we must work together to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to brush away the cobwebs of vandalism.

xBTAx cannot vandalize it's own game. O_o

I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because xBTAx accuses me of being a liar. The only proven liar around here, however, is xBTAx. Only a die-hard liar like xBTAx could claim that it has its moral compass in tact. The truth, in case you haven't already figured it out, is that no matter how bad you think its expostulations are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think.

Ok, so finally you reach the point where xBTAx has done something to you, and that's accusing you of being a liar. Again, I must bash at your prose because it is so difficult to read due to you forcefully injecting these numerous vocabulary words into your essay.

Given the tenor of our times, if I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.

I also want you to know that no matter how much xBTAx squirms and wriggles, it will never escape the fact that it must believe that if it doesn't turn the trickle of gangsterism into a tidal wave, it'll have led a meaningless life.

But perhaps I express it more directly, more candidly, and far less euphemistically than most. For years I've been warning people that xBTAx plans to replace intellectual integrity with high-handed sloganeering. However, that's not my entire message; it's only a part of it. I also want you to know that no matter how much xBTAx squirms and wriggles, it will never escape the fact that it must believe that if it doesn't turn the trickle of gangsterism into a tidal wave, it'll have led a meaningless life.

You don't represent xBTAx. Please do not act like you do.

Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to.

Or you can look at the flip side and nobody hates them as much as you do, and nobody types in as dense material as you do. >_>

We must learn to celebrate our diversity, not because it is the politically correct thing to do but because you may be worried that it will foster parasitism at every opportunity by the end of the decade. If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not worry about that now.

Parasitism doesn't only exist in xBTAx, it exists everywhere. However, you must stop viewing parasitism as parasitism and call it business. The government is leeching off of you in every moment. Why are you not pissed at them? Why must xBTAx's business leeching off of you piss you off so much? And if you hate xBTAx so much, why DO YOU let xBTAx leech off of you? Stop paying them money and play the game without buying NX! It's that simple.

Instead, let's discuss my observation that xBTAx uses language that would make a sailor blush. I won't dwell on that except to direct your attention to the grotesque manner in which it has been trying to inaugurate an era of baleful, lousy oligarchism.

And now let's discuss my observation that you use a language that can crack an egg.

Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that xBTAx's practices are not witty satire, as it would have you believe. They're simply the illaudable, unrealistic ramblings of something that has no idea or appreciation of what it's mocking. Let us now join hands, hearts, and minds to reinforce what is best in people.

And define "Nature's" teachings. You can't learn anything from the great outdoors. Maybe you take a walk in the jungle and then sudden bouts of insight come to your mind telling you how to face situations that you may have encountered before you stepped into the forest. But for the most part, "nature" itself does not teach you anything. Learning occurs through mimicry and observation, but that can only happen when you can draw a parallel to human behavior.

Consider the following, which I'll address in greater detail later: xBTAx is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens its creature comforts, xBTAx throws principle to the wind.

That's called the self-serving bias and it's true for all people.

xBTAx's protégés get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with xBTAx, and meeting some other harebrained wankers is merely a social event. They're not even aware that xBTAx swears that we ought to worship incomprehensible heresiarchs as folk heroes. Clearly, it's living in a world of make-believe, with flowers and bells and leprechauns and magic frogs with funny little hats. Back in the real world, we've all heard xBTAx yammer and whine about how it's being scapegoated again, the poor dear.

So now you're discrediting everyone who has an opposing view? How does that make you better than xBTAx?

It's really amazing, isn't it? We can put people on the Moon and send robot explorers to Mars, but if you can make any sense out xBTAx's wretched taradiddles then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did.

Indeed I did. I speculate that if you write like this to all your teachers, they'll have DIED by the time they gave you ANY marks.

If there is one thing I have learned, it is this: xBTAx's ignorance is encyclopedic. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that its statements such as "Shambolic psychics are easily housebroken" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts.

Your ignorance is encyclopedic too. So far all you've said is that xBTAx is stupid and that you were falsely accused. You took almost two pages to write that. that's worse than someone who's incomprehensible.

Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. xBTAx's goal is to stir up trouble. This is abject cannibalism! I have this advice to offer: The world has changed, xBTAx; get used to it.

The world has changed indeed. The world is ever changing, and so is the reality in which xBTAx creates in their game. If you can't get used to xBTAx's change, then don't tell them to get used to yours.

xBTAx's brethren resist seeing that spleeny prætorianism has come to occupy a dodgy place in the national dialogue. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. If you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, anyone who denies this and insists on looking at issues from a single perspective is a participant in a flat, simplistic, and incomplete world. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, when I hear xBTAx say that it acts in the public interest, I have to wonder about it. Is it thoroughly treasonous? Is it simply being backwards? Or is it merely embracing a delusion in which it must believe in order to continue believing in itself? The answer has two parts to it. The first part regards the manner in which those who lay waste to the environment must be held accountable for their actions. The second part of the answer is focused on the the way that xBTAx possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, it can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it.
xBTAx once heard an irritating, balmy ne'er-do-well say, "I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that xBTAx is as innocent as a newborn lamb." What's amazing is that xBTAx was then able to use that single quotation plus some anecdotal evidence to convince its janissaries that ruffianism is a noble goal, which indubitably makes me wonder, "Why can't it live among us in peace?" To answer that question, we need first to consider xBTAx's thought process, which generally takes the following form: (1) Some people deserve to feel safe while others do not, so (2) we should avoid personal responsibility. Therefore, (3) its decisions are based on reason and thus, (4) things have never been better. As you can see, xBTAx's reasoning makes no sense, which leads me to believe that if you've never seen it give me reason to lose my temper, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.

LoL. I'm not even going to bother. Your writing SUCKS. You use 5 blocks to make two points that aren't even valid.

the f'uck? Someone has a lot of free time. HEY ZOMG IT'S HARRISON!!!1!!!!11111!

Scroll over the symbols. <-

the f'uck? Someone has a lot of free time. HEY ZOMG IT'S HARRISON!!!1!!!!11111!

laughingelfman.jpg.

shadowhoamg@hotmail.com

:]

i dont know why but i dont trust this

Rofl Ken, you brought Harrison's finest hour back to lulz... I mean life.

inb4 Rdal enters thread and tells us all to cease fire.

is he harrisonized's boytoy boyfriend or something

is he harrisonized's boytoy boyfriend or something

he's a chill out type of guy but probably

HArrizonized should be proud of himself.
He became an unforgettable member of this forum