GMSInfighter Wrote:How does one become a hero? (A)
A successful being. (B)
In your eyes, your life is narrow, (A)
and in some, your're lying. (B)
Fixed. Unless you meant "your lying [is narrow]."
GMSInfighter Wrote:It had to be something about our life, and ever since middle school a lot have told me I'll never become successful. So I wanted to write about that.
Who the fk are those guys? Just because they don't view you as the stereotypical "I live a grand life" guy doesn't mean you can still be successful in whatever you want to do. People tell me I won't be able to get a job (because I'm a slacker xP), I tell them: bullshyt, I do what I want to do, and I do it dam well!
I could die a reasonably happy man right now, even if I didn't fulfill the expected role in society as a worker.
KajitiSouls Wrote:Fixed. Unless you meant "your lying [is narrow]."
Who the fk are those guys? Just because they don't view you as the stereotypical "I live a grand life" guy doesn't mean you can still be successful in whatever you want to do. People tell me I won't be able to get a job (because I'm a slacker xP), I tell them: bullshyt, I do what I want to do, and I do it dam well!
I could die a reasonably happy man right now, even if I didn't fulfill the expected role in society as a worker.
Ohh yeah, thanks for the fix.
Er yeah, because I got a D in Geometry and it went on my transcript Freshman year, I guess I ruined every chance I had getting into a good college, as told by teachers, friends, and family.
GMSInfighter Wrote:Er yeah, because I got a D in Geometry and it went on my transcript Freshman year, I guess I ruined every chance I had getting into a good college, as told by teachers, friends, and family.
That's curious. In Washington State, there's a state-wide examination test in lines with "No Child Left Behind", called the WASL. At one point, they made it a graduation requirement to pass all the subject tests, and to everyone's horror when the results were published, a good 38% of total students were failing math. Holy pomegranate.
2009-04-08, 12:36 AM (This post was last modified: 2009-04-08, 12:43 AM by ♥Ji.)
ballad - does that mean it is musical? will we see a song to match this soon? (:
lovely to see people getting familiar with the classic styles again. a lot of young folk think these are out of date but really there is not much new in the world and ithink there is nothing as endearing or fresh as well-written classic stuff. sounds like you have a lot of emotion to be poured out here, it is great that you are turning what must be unhappiness into optimism and using it to motivate yourself
my first instinct was analysing the meter, then realising that maybe that is not the sort of comment you want. i know that meter is always hard, especially after saying it to yourself by the end of writing the poem! just providing a fresh ear to listen to your syllables.
but yes, please ignore the spoiler if it is not appropriate or what you were expecting. hope to see more of your work!
Spoiler
have syllabified and analysed the heavy and light syllables for you so you can see what it looks like. NB: an iamb looks like ti-tum, or light-heavy, which in English is the same as short-long.
Quote:Asuc-cess-ful be-ing.
this line is a bit awkward because you have to make the word "A" heavy to avoid putting two light syllables in a row, which iambic doesn't permit.
Quote:Peo-ple tell you, noyoucan-not ... try-ingtohide your frown. ... Look them deadintheeyes and say,
in these 3 cases it is unlikely the reader will make one of the two short syllables heavy, so they will just say them quickly together - this makes the foot an anapest (light-light-heavy), not an iamb.
Quote:How does one be-come a he-ro?
iambic lines cannot start with a heavy syllable (light-heavy only) - i see this a lot of times (see previous examples). so yes, i do not think you are writing in pure iambs. you are probably using a particular meter that begins with one kind of foot and ends with another. this is not bad though!
(for example classic greek "dactylic hexameter": the first four feet are dactyls or spondees, the fifth a dactyl and the sixth a dactyl or trochee! certainly doesn't only use dactyls - but it is very strict on what it does permit. sorry about geekiness - just trying to show that even if meters are called iambic/dactylic/trochaic etc, they do have variability, even if they do it in very specific ways.)
might be interesting to explore this more - maybe you are using this kind of meter in other poems too.
♥Ji Wrote:ballad - does that mean it is musical? will we see a song to match this soon? (:
lovely to see people getting familiar with the classic styles again. a lot of young folk think these are out of date but really there is not much new in the world and ithink there is nothing as endearing or fresh as well-written classic stuff. sounds like you have a lot of emotion to be poured out here, it is great that you are turning what must be unhappiness into optimism and using it to motivate yourself
my first instinct was analysing the meter, then realising that maybe that is not the sort of comment you want. i know that meter is always hard, especially after saying it to yourself by the end of writing the poem! just providing a fresh ear to listen to your syllables.
but yes, please ignore the spoiler if it is not appropriate or what you were expecting. hope to see more of your work!
Spoiler
have syllabified and analysed the heavy and light syllables for you so you can see what it looks like. NB: an iamb looks like ti-tum, or light-heavy, which in English is the same as short-long. this line is a bit awkward because you have to make the word "A" heavy to avoid putting two light syllables in a row, which iambic doesn't permit. in these 3 cases it is unlikely the reader will make one of the two short syllables heavy, so they will just say them quickly together - this makes the foot an anapest (light-light-heavy), not an iamb. iambic lines cannot start with a heavy syllable (light-heavy only) - i see this a lot of times (see previous examples). so yes, i do not think you are writing in pure iambs. you are probably using a particular meter that begins with one kind of foot and ends with another. this is not bad though!
(for example classic greek "dactylic hexameter": the first four feet are dactyls or spondees, the fifth a dactyl and the sixth a dactyl or trochee! certainly doesn't only use dactyls - but it is very strict on what it does permit. sorry about geekiness - just trying to show that even if meters are called iambic/dactylic/trochaic etc, they do have variability, even if they do it in very specific ways.)
might be interesting to explore this more - maybe you are using this kind of meter in other poems too.
I've never written a ballad in my life, so theres room for plenty of errors. This wasn't for a poetry class, just a simple english class where Iambic meter doesn't really effect the grade too drastically.
