%att vs %damage, for marksmans?

Which one is better? And what i really want know, and for marksmans? Makrsmans don't have much att so wouldn't be better %damage?

Which one is better? And what i really want know, and for marksmans? Makrsmans don't have much att so wouldn't be better %damage?

I'd certainly think so.

Which one is better? And what i really want know, and for marksmans? Makrsmans don't have much att so wouldn't be better %damage?

The amount of att you have is irrelevant to how effective %ATT is, so as long as you have at least 1 attack.

Marksman gain a lot of %TD (not all of them appear in your range) through their skills and assuming you have a few link skills related to %Boss and %TD, you should be focusing on %ATT. Your weapon potentials should be a good mixture of %ATT and %Boss.

Virtually all classes need %ATT or %MATT more than %DMG.

Hadriel

My xbow have 13%att and 17%all(7%+10%) is it worth cubing?:f6:

My xbow have 13%att and 17%all(7%+10%) is it worth cubing?:f6:

Yes, because to have two stat lines at legendary is bad

My xbow have 13%att and 17%all(7%+10%) is it worth cubing?:f6:

depends on if you're leveling or bossing, tbh.

I don't really need boss, i have 211%boss right now, and with the tower of oz emblem(that i normaly have) is 281%boss, so i was looking to get more range.