Guide Contest Q&A
#21
Eos Wrote:General clarification around the R&R topic;

We do not want you trying to explain individual rules. That's what the R&R itself is for.
If you're going to touch the R&R category it needs to be an explanation of where the R&R is, how to read it, and a general overview of crime & punishment here, not an in depth look at specific infractions or scenarios, as those are of limited value

that ain't what it said.
Quote:Cite specific rules of importance and their consequences.
#22
xparasite9 Wrote:that ain't what it said.

Then it got mangled somewhere in editing, since the original clarification on that piece Spiral was given to work with said;

Eos Wrote:R&R section should not be a rehash of what's already in the R&R or try to cite specific rules or the consequences of them, but explain where the R&R is and how to read it. May also explain some of the potential punishments we can enact if anyone is actually brave enough to try.

And his original text for that section was;
Quote:The dreaded rules and regulations! Be sure to mention why they are important, common infractions, and the appeal process. You may use the official Rules and Regulations page as a reference.

Looks like he lost the Or and changed the meaning inadvertently.
It's been updated.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
#23
Hopefully my absolutely shitty entries will help break the ice and boost everyone's confidence and we can get some quality writeups.
#24
Or drive them away in terror of sounding as bad Rolleyes
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
#25
looks like it's working.
#26
So, what were the final results of this thing?
#27
As with most things on this site, no one participated and I stopped caring.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)