CBS Airs Predetermined Results in Advance, Were we all fooled? Rigged?

Double post one more time and I'm giving you a discretionary flooding infraction. Use the edit button.

I shocked I didn't get one already honestly.

@Words

Yes, I did. There were many, many people who calling it rigged and such so I put in the title, nothing more. You clearly said I never said I believe, theoretically, not one person that posted ACTUALLY posted what they thought except for @MissingLink Kudos to you btw. Just pretty haters for my thread title.

I be so sorry Mr. for not being specific enough. Oh lordy lord boss, I be so bad!

I shocked I didn't get one already honestly.

@Words

Yes, I did. There were many, many people who calling it rigged and such so I put in the title, nothing more. You clearly said I never said I believe, theoretically, not one person that posted ACTUALLY posted what they thought except for @MissingLink Kudos to you btw. Just pretty haters for my thread title.

I be so sorry Mr. for not being specific enough. Oh lordy lord boss, I be so bad!

Actually I told you exactly what I thought, but once again you seem to have this problem with sentence comprehension.

Actually I told you exactly what I thought, but once again you seem to have this problem with sentence comprehension.

Mr. Sheep go away.

all you do is state your opinion with no real substantional base. All you've been doing is trying to deflect any opinion on the subject

Mr. Sheep go away.

This stuff is hilarious.

No, you're just pretty annoying, harassing me in game too.

News organizations always want to be the first to break the news, even if it's incorrect or missing facts. They probably pretaped a segment for both Obama and Romney, and will air it the second the polling is done just to they can claim they were the first to do so.

No, you're just pretty annoying, harassing me in game too.

I hope that was directed at someone else or you're going to look really stupid, mr horse.

No, you're just pretty annoying, harassing me in game too.

In game?

News organizations always want to be the first to break the news, even if it's incorrect or missing facts. They probably pretaped a segment for both Obama and Romney, and will air it the second the polling is done just to they can claim they were the first to do so.

I don't see how it would be anything but this. Why are we discussing again?

Ron Paul could have saved this country, now no matter what we are doomed, I'll vote for Romney just to hope for better gas prices and that's it, I can't afford paying these prices and pumping high grade.

I don't mean to nitpick and don't want to make this thread a political discussion, but the President doesn't have that much control over gasoline prices. You shouldn't make your presidential decision without more information.

Sources:

 Spoiler

ThinkProgress: The Charts That Prove Obama Doesn’t Set Gas Prices

ThePriceofFuel.com

Ron Paul could have saved this country, now no matter what we are doomed, I'll vote for Romney just to hope for better gas prices and that's it, I can't afford paying these prices and pumping high grade.

I see you time and time again make these comments and have become thoroughly convinced that you don't know jack-pomegranate about what you're saying.

The fact that you would even consider voting for Mitt Romney in spite of the fact that he goes against virtually everything Ron Paul stood for is proof enough. This thread should be closed on the basis of TS ignorance.

The fact that you would even consider voting for Mitt Romney in spite of the fact that he goes against virtually everything Ron Paul stood for is proof enough. This thread should be closed on the basis of TS ignorance.

Because gas prices!

Because gas prices!

If he wanted lower gas prices so badly he should have voted for Newt Gingrich.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/24/news/eco.../index.htm

I know nothing of America, or politics, or American Politics.

But I find this thread hilarious, bloody good show chaps.

I see you time and time again make these comments and have become thoroughly convinced that you don't know jack-pomegranate about what you're saying.

The fact that you would even consider voting for Mitt Romney in spite of the fact that he goes against virtually everything Ron Paul stood for is proof enough. This thread should be closed on the basis of TS ignorance.

I know Ron Paul didn't endorse him and refuses to endorse him and pretty much hates him that doesn't mean I'm not gonna go ahead and pick the lesser evil of the two.

Lol, I'm not gonna type of an essay on every reason I'm voting for someone, gas's just one of reasons. The president doesn't control the gas is true that he said hell no to the pipeline which would have made the gas a lot cheaper if we just drill here.

Newt's not the GOP and write ins mean nothing in my state.

I know Ron Paul didn't endorse him and refuses to endorse him and pretty much hates him that doesn't mean I'm not gonna go ahead and pick the lesser evil of the two.

Lol, I'm not gonna type of an essay on every reason I'm voting for someone, gas's just one of reasons. The president doesn't control the gas is true that he said hell no to the pipeline which would have made the gas a lot cheaper if we just drill here.

Newt's not the GOP and write ins mean nothing in my state.

I would love to see how you rationalize the lesser of two evils.

EDIT: Also Obama isn't against the pipeline, he had to say no because it couldn't be reveiwed properly. That and an alternate route wasn't even presented. I felt his decision was for the best, signing an unread contract is dumb.

Im sorry @Coogi but youre giving Ron Paul supporters a really bad name. Please, just stop.

I know Ron Paul didn't endorse him and refuses to endorse him and pretty much hates him that doesn't mean I'm not gonna go ahead and pick the lesser evil of the two.

Lol, I'm not gonna type of an essay on every reason I'm voting for someone, gas's just one of reasons. The president doesn't control the gas is true that he said hell no to the pipeline which would have made the gas a lot cheaper if we just drill here.

Newt's not the GOP and write ins mean nothing in my state.

I've read this a few times and I keep coming back to it thinking that I'll find some semblance of logic residing somewhere beyond the blatant stupidity. In an ideal world you choose the candidate that best aligns himself with your views and hopeful direction for the country. In your case: Ron Paul. He is your model president, and should he have been the Republican candidate would have your vote. But since he didn't get the vote, you're choosing instead to vote for someone who is in every sense the opposite of what Ron Paul stood for. Why would you go against someone that is contrary to your "ideal" viewpoint?

The only way I can make sense of this rational is if you're really just one of those people who watched a few youtube videos in which Ron Paul made a few good claims and told an opposing candidate to sit down while he finished his statement, while really having no clue what he stood for. If you did, you wouldn't be so easily casting your vote in the direction of Romney.

Does not compute.