A) Leveling to 250 will be as impossible as leveling to 200 was pre 3rd-job. Or maybe only as hard as it was pre-BB. People will be leaving for private servers in droves. Isn't that what BB was supposed to cure? Didn't Nexon decide Maple needed to appeal to the masses, not just the grind-addicts?
B) The new "high level content" will include areas/bosses/quests that give mad experience. Then everybody who's 200 (or close to it) now, will be 250 in 2-3 months, and whining again about the lack of content and being bored.
So, umm... what, exactly, does this new level cap solve?
I'd prefer if there was some impossible level to reach. Getting to 200 is far too easy now, I miss Pre-E.X.P.losion days.
Polantaris Wrote:They should have made it 256 for the sake of those who get the joke.
16 trillion? Welp, looks like I will never get max level even after having played MapleStory since GMS v0.02 Beta.
at 1 million exp a kill, if you were to kill 3 mobs per second it would take 61 days to get from 249->250. (I forgot a part of the calculation lmao, was WAY off before.)
So they quite literally HAVE to introduce new training areas with mobs that give way more exp than we've ever thought possible, otherwise it'll be years before someone hits cap. That calculation I made assumes playing every second of every day of those 61 days, so....yeah. Not going to happen. And that's just for the last level.
Is there any source of this exp table being right? Because i couldnt see it anywhere.
Sorry but i dont believe on the table being right because the first two levels share the same multiplier, it could be wrong like the old exp table that was posted a few days ago.
ponsez Wrote:Is there any source of this exp table being right? Because i couldnt see it anywhere.
Sorry but i dont believe on the table being right because the first two levels share the first multiplier, it could be wrong like the old exp table that was posted a few days ago.
There's no confirmation set for 202 ~ 249 TNL requirements. All of this is based on the difference between level 200 to 201's and 201 to 202's TNL requirements. Dividing 201's TNL requirement with 200's TNL requirement gives a number of 1.2x, which was used to calculate these estimates.
Again, there's no confirmation on any of this and it could change.
There's no confirmation set for 202 ~ 249 TNL requirements. All of this is based on the difference between level 200 to 201's and 201 to 202's TNL requirements. Dividing 201's TNL requirement with 200's TNL requirement gives a number of 1.2x, which was used to calculate these estimates.
Again, there's no confirmation on any of this and it could change.
Ok thanks. I asked because apparently everywhere people said that this table is 100% right but i couldnt find anything confirming it.
Kaasoljoyyx Wrote:Before they had grims/himes giving 3k exp a kill.
Completely off-topic but OMG I FORGOT ALL ABOUT HIMES! ~.~ I need to get over there and start grinding...
Justin Wrote:So they quite literally HAVE to introduce new training areas with mobs that give way more exp than we've ever thought possible, otherwise it'll be years before someone hits cap. That calculation I made assumes playing every second of every day of those 61 days, so....yeah. Not going to happen. And that's just for the last level.
I am totally fine with that.
I mean, yeah sure the game should appeal to the masses, but without that one almost unreachable level there's nothing to look forward to. Not to mention, if they made the exp gap between 249 to 250 wider, Nexon would make tons off of 2x exp coupons and... whatever else you can use to get more exp. And, as we all know, Nexon's all about the money
Satellite Wrote:I wish they would make you not lose exp when dying past 200. With that req exp losing a few % is already a big loss.
I would prefer to be able to do root abyss without the fear of losing over a billion in exp.
Andwoos Wrote:Assuming I did my math correctly and didn't mess up on any of the numbers...
100,413,504,201,467.
Chicocl Wrote:100,413,512,348,915
I'll check the count later.
I did it as well -- I came up with a different value. 100,413,504,118,391 EXP.
I wrote it with this code:
Spoiler
Code:
int main() {
long long tnl = 2207026470;
long long total = tnl;
for(size_t level = 201; level < 250; ++level) {
tnl *= 1.2;
std::cout << prettyprint(tnl) << '\n';
total += tnl;
}
std::cout << prettyprint(total);
}
My Interpretation of the table
Level
Required EXP
200
2,207,026,470
201
2,648,431,763
202
3,178,118,115
203
3,813,741,737
204
4,576,490,084
205
5,491,788,100
206
6,590,145,719
207
7,908,174,862
208
9,489,809,834
209
11,387,771,800
210
13,665,326,159
211
16,398,391,390
212
19,678,069,667
213
23,613,683,600
214
28,336,420,319
215
34,003,704,382
216
40,804,445,258
217
48,965,334,309
218
58,758,401,170
219
70,510,081,403
220
84,612,097,683
221
101,534,517,219
222
121,841,420,662
223
146,209,704,794
224
175,451,645,752
225
210,541,974,902
226
252,650,369,882
227
303,180,443,858
228
363,816,532,629
229
436,579,839,154
230
523,895,806,984
231
628,674,968,380
232
754,409,962,055
233
905,291,954,465
234
1,086,350,345,357
235
1,303,620,414,428
236
1,564,344,497,313
237
1,877,213,396,775
238
2,252,656,076,129
239
2,703,187,291,354
240
3,243,824,749,624
241
3,892,589,699,548
242
4,671,107,639,457
243
5,605,329,167,348
244
6,726,395,000,817
245
8,071,674,000,980
246
9,686,008,801,175
247
11,623,210,561,409
248
13,947,852,673,690
249
16,737,423,208,427
Total
100,413,504,118,391
Please note, I think using these values to formulate an equation is absolutely moronic and it shouldn't even be used as a basis for the future levels. Nexon Korea has some strange wankery with the EXP tables such as 5 levels being the same (70-75, 120-125, etc) so using two levels as the foundation for the other 248 levels is quite dumb and a very bad way to extrapolate, especially with something as dumb as a 1.2x multiplier. If I get more values I can try a regression type model that would probably fit better -- but as of now I consider these values to be absolute trash.
![[Image: oUfse8v.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/oUfse8v.jpg)
