Southperry Omok tournament!

How exactly are we going to do this cross-world? Make characters on each world? I could do that... maybe...

How exactly are we going to do this cross-world? Make characters on each world? I could do that... maybe...

Read the entire thread, at first it was like that but we decided it be better to just do khaini and have everyone make mules.(sorry didnt mean to come across stern, but reading all the spoilers covers almost everything)

Trying again

http://www.basilmarket.com/forum/2380396

No cheating, pimento. We all know how much you need to feed your NX habit. All that......Mabinogi rebirthing....

Rebirthing is free enough not to need more and my account has premium service for months thanks to all the credit owed me from hackings and down time.

Making an omok event not givin a fkkk. ofc im in. but if khainiwest is the final boss of the tornament no one is going to win. Moldyvort/khaini

I'm in. So hard to find people willing to play Omak in Zenith. I think the last time I had a match we were waiting for CHT timer.

I'll post an ign when I get around to making a character in Khania. Dunno when I can since my desktop suddenly stopped working today.

I'll need additional time for moves if I have to play on my laptop since it has 1minute lag spikes I can "play" maple on a toaster!

Read the entire thread, at first it was like that but we decided it be better to just do khaini and have everyone make mules.(sorry didnt mean to come across stern, but reading all the spoilers covers almost everything)

Trying again

http://www.basilmarket.com/forum/2380396

brought down again.

and GG, i'm in, getting my ass whupped sooo hard.

Wow we have a grand total of 10 people 80 people looked at the thread last night and NONE of them could follow instructions.

FKIN EXPECTED

I'll smega in bera and scania later today, maybe windia

Your original post still says "mules in every server" under "how it works," and also "list of their IGN's" under "format."

I did some more elaborating to make it a little more clear.

Dont use scissors of karma on me! I dont wanna be cut :C

[MENTION=4235]KhainiWest[/MENTION] what does "You will play 6 rounds essentially. 1 set of 2/3 will be played with one player starting out first." mean?

@KhainiWest what does "You will play 6 rounds essentially. 1 set of 2/3 will be played with one player starting out first." mean?

Locked vs khainiwest

Locked opens omok
-play 2/3 wins

Khainiwest opens omok
Plays 2/3 wins

Locked vs khainiwest

Locked opens omok
-play 2/3 wins

Khainiwest opens omok
Plays 2/3 wins

What if
Locked wins first 2 games out of 3. Then you set your board up and win 2 games out of 3. The case of a tie would be 2 wins on me and 2 wins on you. Who would go first in your scenario?

What if
Locked wins first 2 games out of 3. Then you set your board up and win 2 games out of 3. The case of a tie would be 2 wins on me and 2 wins on you. Who would go first in your scenario?

Then you'd pay another set of 6 until someone wins 4/6. Essentially you have to beat the first 2/3 and win the second 2/3.

Then you'd pay another set of 6 until someone wins 4/6. Essentially you have to beat the first 2/3 and win the second 2/3.

There are better and more efficient ways of doing it. If the complaint is people want a fair shot at being first then you can impose different solutions.

1. Play the game normally. Usually the loser ends up going first anyway, it can't be that bad honestly. Make it out of 5.
2. Play the game one at a time. Player 1 sets up board and goes first for 1 game. Player 2 sets up board afterwards for 1 game. Player 1 then sets up board. This keeps going until you reach 3 wins out of 5.

There are better and more efficient ways of doing it. If the complaint is people want a fair shot at being first then you can impose different solutions.

1. Play the game normally. Usually the loser ends up going first anyway, it can't be that bad honestly. Make it out of 5.
2. Play the game one at a time. Player 1 sets up board and goes first for 1 game. Player 2 sets up board afterwards for 1 game. Player 1 then sets up board. This keeps going until you reach 3 wins out of 5.

The problem is that being first or second changes your chances of winning, so it would be unfair for the player who does less matches as first.

There are better and more efficient ways of doing it. If the complaint is people want a fair shot at being first then you can impose different solutions.

1. Play the game normally. Usually the loser ends up going first anyway, it can't be that bad honestly. Make it out of 5.
2. Play the game one at a time. Player 1 sets up board and goes first for 1 game. Player 2 sets up board afterwards for 1 game. Player 1 then sets up board. This keeps going until you reach 3 wins out of 5.

I know there are more efficient ways (my first idea was the first one you presented) but it's OMOK MAN WE WANT LOTS OF GAMES.

You could play it (kind of) like Tennis.

Player 1 starts off. S/he starts for an entire set (Best out of 3, let's say). After the first set, Player 2 starts. Have to lead by 2 sets to win the match.

Though that could go on for a long time. I know there's an end point setup for Tennis in case it keeps rotating back and forth for the winner(therefore a stalemate), but I forget what that is.

Don't forget to advertise via buddylist guys. I didn't get to smega this weekend because of drama but I'll try this friday. I'm hoping at least 30 people qq

I have a mule and all but training level 13-16 kinda sucks cause Khaini's really laggy for me.

I might sign up.