Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
It's a wonder this hasn't been posted yet
#21
Didn't expect that.
Reply
#22
Sarah Wrote:Well Ashton is a good guy so I'm not sure why Dustin would be calling him a moron. Or maybe he's just saying things because he don't know anything about the case besides what he's read online today.

No it was Baez, I remember listening to her garbage where she was defending him saying how they were great friends.

lolojsimpsonrepeat. I've been reading abou this the last like month, and sadly expected no less.
Reply
#23
KhainiWest Wrote:No it was Baez, I remember listening to her garbage where she was defending him saying how they were great friends.

lolojsimpsonrepeat. I've been reading abou this the last like month, and sadly expected no less.

I knew it was over when Baez was doing his closing argument. There was no way they were going to charge her with murder on very CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. They can, sure, but they won't.

Either way, she looks extremely happy. Now go move far away and change your name so no one tries to kill you. If they don't kill you in jail that is.

Fox 35 in Orlando says she'll most likely be out by Christmas. Crazy. I look forward to someone bringing Cindy Anthony up on charges of perjury for obviously lying for her daughter.
Reply
#24
xLeviathan Wrote:I knew it was over when Baez was doing his closing argument. There was no way they were going to charge her with murder on CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

Either way, she looks extremely happy. Now go move far away and change your name so no one tries to kill you. If they don't kill you in jail that is.

She has no chance at a life now. Everyone in the world knows who she is and knows she's a pathological liar. She can't be trusted. Her family won't take her back--she accused her father and brother of molesting her.

This ridiculous and unjust. The american system is fucked up.
Reply
#25
xLeviathan Wrote:I knew it was over when Baez was doing his closing argument. There was no way they were going to charge her with murder on very CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. They can, sure, but they won't.

Either way, she looks extremely happy. Now go move far away and change your name so no one tries to kill you. If they don't kill you in jail that is.

Yeah I was in the same boat, they didn't actually prove she did it. It just she made it really obvious she may have. There's also a lot of pomegranate said/seen that we did and they didn't.

@sarah

...Sarah, think about this, the rights to this story are a gold mine, interviews everything. This girl is set for life. What a decade in prison, she'll come out a near millionaire, everyones clamoring over eachother to buy rights to this story.
Reply
#26
KhainiWest Wrote:Yeah I was in the same boat, they didn't actually prove she did it. It just she made it really obvious she may have. There's also a lot of pomegranate said/seen that we did and they didn't.

@sarah

...Sarah, think about this, the rights to this story are a gold mine, interviews everything. This girl is set for life. What a decade in prison, she'll come out a near millionaire, everyones clamoring over eachother to buy rights to this story.

A decade? She'll (probably) be out by Christmas. We'll see you back here on Thursday for the sentencing. xD

Thank gosh I don't owe Sarah $20. :|
Reply
#27
What a crock!
I had to turn on the TV. >.<
Reply
#28
I echo Sarah's Wow.
Reply
#29
White Wrote:I echo Sarah's Wow.

You have too much faith in society, it's not the court system, it's the lack of common sense these citizens have. Honestly, they are f`ucking retarded.
Reply
#30
KhainiWest Wrote:You have too much faith in society, it's not the court system, it's the lack of common sense these citizens have. Honestly, they are f`ucking retarded.

People didn't learn with Vick, Plax, and O.J.
Reply
#31
KhainiWest Wrote:You have too much faith in society, it's not the court system, it's the lack of common sense these citizens have. Honestly, they are f`ucking retarded.

The problem is absolutely the court system because it is what allows 12 regular joes to make big decisions.

I wouldn't put my life in the hands of 12 of my friends let alone 12 strangers.
Reply
#32
Sarah Wrote:The problem is absolutely the court system because it is what allows 12 regular joes to make big decisions.

I wouldn't put my life in the hands of 12 of my friends let alone 12 strangers.

Without solid evidence everyone making a judgment is just 12 regular joes. It's all touchy-feely what-d-you-think? kind-of bullpomegranate. As it is true the circumstantial evidence puts her in the right place at the right time, it also allows for the child to have drowned in the pool. It's opinion at that point.
Reply
#33
Sarah Wrote:The problem is absolutely the court system because it is what allows 12 regular joes to make big decisions.

I wouldn't put my life in the hands of 12 of my friends let alone 12 strangers.

Not entirely true, the judge by any regard can override them and tell them to f`uck off, he didn't, god knows why.
Reply
#34
She's already been held for 3 years for this case to surface so at most I expect her to serve one more year for these charges which each warrant 4 years of jail-time at a maximum, but can be served all at once.

I understand why she was found not guilty, and I honestly am glad. But that doesn't mean that Casey Anthony is a good person. She is absolutely disgusting and a horrible mother. That fact alone, though, does not make her guilty. The evidence was too circumstantial and Baez's closing was the best way to break it down for the jury. It's a great shame that little Caylee will most likely never find justice.
Reply
#35
KhainiWest Wrote:Not entirely true, the judge by any regard can override them and tell them to f`uck off, he didn't, god knows why.

Because "lol I think she was guilty" isn't good enough reason and it would be appealed and re-tried.

Agreed wholeheartedly 100% with above.
Reply
#36
xLeviathan Wrote:Without solid evidence everyone making a judgment is just 12 regular joes. It's all touchy-feely what-d-you-think? kind-of bullpomegranate. As it is true the circumstantial evidence puts her in the right place at the right time, it also allows for the child to have drowned in the pool. It's opinion at that point.

Are you serious? There's no evidence she drowned.

Let's assume she did drown, let's use the defense's case where EVIL EVIL GEORGE had told her to dispose of the body because she would be blamed. Let's assume that is the truth. What good reason is there to go out partying for the next 31 days? To get a TATTOO THAT SAYS "THE GOOD LIFE"

The evidence is circumstantial but it's more than just compelling, it's completely damning. This jury is either full of morons or full of people seeking fame and figured they'd get more by doing the controversial thing.
Reply
#37
xLeviathan Wrote:Because "lol I think she was guilty" isn't good enough reason and it would be appealed and re-tried.

Even if the evidence is circumstantial, it's obvious what happened. Like entirely obvious, hard evidence isn't always necessary and a good "opinion" does normally pull through. These representatives clearly was looking for a big "HEY OBVIOUS BLOOD ON HER FACE", which is just completely unrealistic.
Reply
#38
Sarah Wrote:Are you serious? There's no evidence she drowned.

Let's assume she did drown, let's use the defense's case where EVIL EVIL GEORGE had told her to dispose of the body because she would be blamed. Let's assume that is the truth. What good reason is there to go out partying for the next 31 days? To get a TATTOO THAT SAYS "THE GOOD LIFE"

The evidence is circumstantial but it's more than just compelling, it's completely damning. This jury is either full of morons or full of people seeking fame and figured they'd get more by doing the controversial thing.

I think it had a lot to do with pressure, to be honest. The jury has been sitting on their ass for so long and the pressure was definitely on to come to an agreement instead of arguing it out for another week. This is no new concept. This has happened in similar cases.

There is no good reason.
Reply
#39
Sarah Wrote:Are you serious? There's no evidence she drowned.

Let's assume she did drown, let's use the defense's case where EVIL EVIL GEORGE had told her to dispose of the body because she would be blamed. Let's assume that is the truth. What good reason is there to go out partying for the next 31 days? To get a TATTOO THAT SAYS "THE GOOD LIFE"

The evidence is circumstantial but it's more than just compelling, it's completely damning. This jury is either full of morons or full of people seeking fame and figured they'd get more by doing the controversial thing.

The problem with out system is that the evidence can be extremely compelling, but in a criminal case like this there can't be any doubt. Any doubt at all. If a juror for one second doubted that Casey was not the one that murdered Caylee, then they had to deliver a verdict of not guilty.
Reply
#40
xLeviathan Wrote:I think it had a lot to do with pressure, to be honest. The jury has been sitting on their ass for so long and the pressure was definitely on to come to an agreement instead of arguing it out for another week. This is no new concept. This has happened in similar cases.

There is no good reason.

But for cases like that there was doubt. You cannot explain in any means why a mother would wait a month to report her child missing, then lie about the child was abducted, only to find the child dead in the back of the trunk. Sure there were no dna or pictures but jesus. There's no, 0, justification of just leaving your child in the unknown for a month only for her to turn up like that.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)